hello

[cheesetray]

are there any true gentlemen in here who would like to engage in som
private intelligent intercourse, you just have to start, and i ca
contribute with my sharp perspicacity and questioning and/o
additions, all of which are equally stimulating, i have discovere
from the responses of those sharing their higher knowledge with me
university professors, psychologists, high-priced lawyers, man
scientists (this last one i think in fact of written materials online
including from MIT and johns hopkins, and i could have writte
letters....DESTROYING THEM, but i was too lazy, i didn't care tha
much, most of it was due to a higher understanding of semantics an
the construction of english, and how to write, although in cases o
subjects with which i am not familiar, i didn't even know what th
hell was being proposed it was that poorly/illogically written, thus
would not have been able to provide/suggest proper alternatives)...an
in some cases...even when the topic was outside of my ken but suc
that i could contribute with the things i have mentioned, i hav
discovered that my intelligence was much higher than my more highl
educated partners for discussion.....sadly.....

[cheesetray]

Post by cheesetray
are there any true gentlemen in here who would like to engage i

some private intelligent intercourse, you just have to start, and
can contribute with my sharp perspicacity and questioning and/o
additions, all of which are equally stimulating, i have discovere
from the responses of those sharing their higher knowledge with me
university professors, psychologists, high-priced lawyers, man
scientists (this last one i think in fact of written materials online
including from MIT and johns hopkins, and i could have writte
letters....DESTROYING THEM, but i was too lazy, i didn't care tha
much, most of it was due to a higher understanding of semantics an
the construction of english, and how to write, although in cases o
subjects with which i am not familiar, i didn't even know what th
hell was being proposed it was that poorly/illogically written, thus
would not have been able to provide/suggest proper alternatives)...an
in some cases...even when the topic was outside of my ken but suc
that i could contribute with the things i have mentioned, i hav
discovered that my intelligence was much higher than my more highl
educated partners for discussion.....sadly.....

if you'r
wondering (not anybody w/superior IQs of course) but just to b
friendly, about how i could *know* it was illogical, as opposed to
deficiency on MY part in comprehension, i *think* (not 100% sure, bu
based on what i know) the best way to describe it is, it wasn'
mathematically sound? i could tear it apart, logically. and it was NO
an issue of definition, i promise

you know, cuz you could say, well, sometimes words have two meanings
(or many more, including opposite), but you'll just have to take m
word for it, that was NOT the issue


This is a response to the post seen at
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=672653206#67265320

[cheesetray]

Post by cheesetray
are there any true gentlemen in here who would like to engage i

some private intelligent intercourse, you just have to start, and
can contribute with my sharp perspicacity and questioning and/o
additions, all of which are equally stimulating, i have discovere
from the responses of those sharing their higher knowledge with me
university professors, psychologists, high-priced lawyers, man
scientists (this last one i think in fact of written materials online
including from MIT and johns hopkins, and i could have writte
letters....DESTROYING THEM, but i was too lazy, i didn't care tha
much, most of it was due to a higher understanding of semantics an
the construction of english, and how to write, although in cases o
subjects with which i am not familiar, i didn't even know what th
hell was being proposed it was that poorly/illogically written, thus
would not have been able to provide/suggest proper alternatives)...an
in some cases...even when the topic was outside of my ken but suc
that i could contribute with the things i have mentioned, i hav
discovered that my intelligence was much higher than my more highl
educated partners for discussion.....sadly.....

not referrin
to professors at the university. (intelligence

btw, this is only my opinion as to destroying them, perhaps they sa
it differently, but i believe in that case then, based on prio
experience, my observations would be considered quite bright. since
was too lazy or didn't care so much about it, i never wrote, and thu
never had the opportunity to receive responses. perhaps it was unfai
of me to jump the gun and say destroy, but honestly, i have neve
really had responses countering my contributions, merely just bein
impressed, which often is even lost on me, and i can't understand ho
they didn't see what i was saying, it seemed so obvious to me


This is a response to the post seen at
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=672653206#67265320

[cheesetray]

Post by cheesetray
are there any true gentlemen in here who would like to engage i

some private intelligent intercourse, you just have to start, and
can contribute with my sharp perspicacity and questioning and/o
additions, all of which are equally stimulating, i have discovere
from the responses of those sharing their higher knowledge with me
university professors, psychologists, high-priced lawyers, man
scientists (this last one i think in fact of written materials online
including from MIT and johns hopkins, and i could have writte
letters....DESTROYING THEM, but i was too lazy, i didn't care tha
much, most of it was due to a higher understanding of semantics an
the construction of english, and how to write, although in cases o
subjects with which i am not familiar, i didn't even know what th
hell was being proposed it was that poorly/illogically written, thus
would not have been able to provide/suggest proper alternatives)...an
in some cases...even when the topic was outside of my ken but suc
that i could contribute with the things i have mentioned, i hav
discovered that my intelligence was much higher than my more highl
educated partners for discussion.....sadly.....

that was in a
educational science journal based out of MI


This is a response to the post seen at
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=672653206#67265320

[cheesetray]

Post by cheesetray
are there any true gentlemen in here who would like to engage i

some private intelligent intercourse, you just have to start, and
can contribute with my sharp perspicacity and questioning and/o
additions, all of which are equally stimulating, i have discovere
from the responses of those sharing their higher knowledge with me
university professors, psychologists, high-priced lawyers, man
scientists (this last one i think in fact of written materials online
including from MIT and johns hopkins, and i could have writte
letters....DESTROYING THEM, but i was too lazy, i didn't care tha
much, most of it was due to a higher understanding of semantics an
the construction of english, and how to write, although in cases o
subjects with which i am not familiar, i didn't even know what th
hell was being proposed it was that poorly/illogically written, thus
would not have been able to provide/suggest proper alternatives)...an
in some cases...even when the topic was outside of my ken but suc
that i could contribute with the things i have mentioned, i hav
discovered that my intelligence was much higher than my more highl
educated partners for discussion.....sadly.....

educational
cutting edge scientific research (academic


This is a response to the post seen at
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=672653206#67265320

[cheesetray]

Post by cheesetray
are there any true gentlemen in here who would like to engage i

some private intelligent intercourse, you just have to start, and
can contribute with my sharp perspicacity and questioning and/o
additions, all of which are equally stimulating, i have discovere
from the responses of those sharing their higher knowledge with me
university professors, psychologists, high-priced lawyers, man
scientists (this last one i think in fact of written materials online
including from MIT and johns hopkins, and i could have writte
letters....DESTROYING THEM, but i was too lazy, i didn't care tha
much, most of it was due to a higher understanding of semantics an
the construction of english, and how to write, although in cases o
subjects with which i am not familiar, i didn't even know what th
hell was being proposed it was that poorly/illogically written, thus
would not have been able to provide/suggest proper alternatives)...an
in some cases...even when the topic was outside of my ken but suc
that i could contribute with the things i have mentioned, i hav
discovered that my intelligence was much higher than my more highl
educated partners for discussion.....sadly.....

although i
one science article, it did actually boil down to, well, what exactl
*is* a stimulant. it was so broken-down, it was mind-blowing. and th
reason i bring it up, is because i am no so confident that a respons
letter would have explained it for me.

i *think*, it's like this. for example, a show on tv, about words. an
they were saying, well, if you use a dictionary, and one word leads t
another word, to come to a higher understanding. well, guess what
it's a wild goose chase. it's a dog chasing its tail

what it boils down to, according to this illuminatory (that's not
word? red squiggle) educational show, was, get this: (actually i thin
i mentioned this once before) but

energy=energ

so there! (says the woman who's worse for wear....yikes!!! :-///


This is a response to the post seen at
http://www.jlaforums.com/viewtopic.php?p=672653206#67265320