I am genuinly curious!
Actually, circumcision doesnt cause much debate anywhere.
Except amongst jews who want to push it onto everyone else so they don't
look like the odd man out. Good way to blend in.
Howver, the topic causes a lot of debate from a small group who are
opposed to circumcision.
Nature and God are opposed to it as well as 85% of the world's men. We all
know who the small group is who want to push circumcision.
Some of these are civil libertarians who
believe the individual should decide, in adulthood, whether he wants to
keep his foreskin.
It's called informed consent. If you tried to circumcise a female it would
be considered a crime notwithstanding the fact that in females it might
actually be of some benefit sexually while in males circumcision causes a
50% loss in sexual function.
Some are convinced that the foreskin has some
It does but you wouldn't know that and NEVER will loser.
and is not merely the protective covering it appears
to be. These people often produce cogent arguments which,
Which is more than the primitive cutters can do. All they can do is quote
some nonsense from the Talmud about some old crazy yahoodie named Abraham
who cut off part of his cock. Since no one's buying that nonsense they have
their jew "doctors" pushing the health and cleanliness thing lol In that
case, females should be the first cut since they are naturally dirtier than
Unfortunately there is another, rather larger group of complete
crackpots who take up the foreskin cause, and they are all too
apparent here. They include everything from antisemites to homosexual
smegmaphiles to foreskin fetishists of one kind or another. You will
know them by their posts, which are distinguished by contempt for
You couldn't understand scientific research. Every time someone publishes
something you pooh pooh it unless it coincides with your jew customs.
arguments based on emotion rather than reason,
Yep sounds like the cutters to me
conspiracy theories galore, ethnic insults, an inability to
distinguish opinion from fact, and juvenile "debating" tactics.
Try debating me in public little boy where you must follow the rules of
debate and see how smart you are. The panel deciding who the winner of the
debate is would be chosen the same way a jury is chosen by eliminating any
biased "jurors" which would immediately disqualify any jew, muslim or
african who practises circumcision because none of those people can be
unbiased. Just as in a trial, the evidence, in this case scientific studies,
is very close and it takes a very intelligent person to sort it out and
determine which studies are more true. You see, just having a study which
shows circumcision is beneficial means nothing because cases are decided on
the weight and validity of the evidence. And in the case of circumcision
there is a presumption that the foreskin is a necessary part of the body
simply because it exists and was put there by Nature for a purpose. Any
argument you can make would be invalid unless you included circumcising
females in it as well.
their most reprehensible faults is their dogmatic refusal to accept the
findings from over 30 scientific research studies which link foreskins
to the spread of HIV.
There are no studies idiot. If you know anything about contagious diseases
you would know that they are more virulent at the onset and become more
benign with time eg. syphilis, smallpox, plague etc AIDS has reached its
peak and has leveled off so circumcising men and then pointing out that
infection from AIDS has decreased would mean nothing since it was decreasing
anyway. At this point the people with the strongest immune systems and also
a natural immunity to the AIDS virus have survived and it's unlikely they
will contract it whether they're circumcised or not. Thre reason homosexuals
are the main group infected with AIDS is not just the mode of sexual contact
but also their weak immune systems caused by other non lethal sexually
transmitted diseases. It's a matter of numbers and sexual partners. When you
have a 1000 sexual partners(NY Times, look it up yourself) as opposed to the
7-8 among the average straight male you're bound to catch something.