Discussion:
What is this news group about?
(too old to reply)
Patrick Turner
2005-01-16 06:28:56 UTC
Permalink
I saw the address for soc.men on a cross posted subject and then I
subscribed to this group to see what it was.
Pardon my curiosity.

Could it be defined at all?, I asked myself after reading a few threads.

What does soc.men really mean?

Does it mean Society men? or sock it to the men, hit em with a feminyst
punch?

Or does it mean Social men, who don't need hitting by anyone,
surely not by feminists.
Does soc stand for "silly old c---" ( could be male or female.....)
Well ok, "silly old cowboy" then...

In other groups I partake, the name of the group implies the reason
for its existance, and anything discussed relates to that, and there is
no
need for a definition of purpose, because the name is the flag for the
ship.
Perhaps that is a very masculine thing, this definition of purpose,
but wheras there is an undefined purpose for being, and in fact if the
purpose for being is to exist undefined,
then it seems feminine.

From what I do see however, there is more expressed intelligence here
than the
one liner banalities I see so evident in groups elsewhere on the web in
the public discussion groups.
When I visit such groups I feel despondent about humanity, ( and
huwomanity )
although most such groups seem male dominated and by males capable of
very
limited comunication ability.

At least it appears some women hang out here.
But perhaps they to are men who have all addopted women's names, who
knows.

Somebody said here that the more intelligent a woman is, the less likely
it is that she'll marry.
Well of course, it means she is bright enough to survive on her own.
It also means that men don't like women smart enough to argue with them.

And thus intelligent women make men turn their gaze to the portugese
maid.
There is tremendous fear amoungst men out there of being seriously
ripped apart
when loves finally evolves into hate during a divorce settlement,
since intelligent women and smart lawyers have more potency than a
tsumi.

Probably many folks here come stained by life's accumulated experiences
to the present time,
but I think I am lucky to not have had to consider whether the portugese
maid
was more of a love option than my "wife".
I don't have a wife, or a maid. I tried the former once, but she mistook

standing up to me for leaving me, a common mistake young folks make.
The latter is far too expensive, although here in Oz the maid is more
likely
to be a Filipino, and they'd think I am too old and poor to marry, but
if I was rich
they'd never notice my age.

Is there a entry form I have to fill out to enter this group?
Do I have to have had quite a few maids, gained several degrees and a
uni,
been married to one or more versions of Ms Illustrious & Marrylogically
Correct, and earned
lots of money to afford the leisure time to consider the issues and pay
lawyers fees?
Do I have to appear before a committee, or a damned tribunal to be
assessed for
a fit and proper person to yac on here about all this stuff?

Patrick Turner.
krp
2005-01-16 11:50:21 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick Turner
I saw the address for soc.men on a cross posted subject and then I
subscribed to this group to see what it was.
Pardon my curiosity.
Could it be defined at all?, I asked myself after reading a few threads.
It is about men's issues. Things that matter to MEN. However, Feminists
feel it is a great forum to HARASS and attack men in.

It is, after all, only what you make it.
Lady Chatterly
2005-01-16 11:52:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by krp
Post by Patrick Turner
I saw the address for soc.men on a cross posted subject and then I
subscribed to this group to see what it was.
Pardon my curiosity.
Could it be defined at all?, I asked myself after reading a few threads.
It is about men's issues. Things that matter to MEN. However, Feminists
feel it is a great forum to HARASS and attack men in.
Nothing to you, for example are too dense and do our own thing.
Post by krp
It is, after all, only what you make it.
Any questions

--
Lady Chatterly

"It ain't a bot. Bot's are smarter, funnier, more interesting." --
Gary L. Burnore
Patrick Turner
2005-01-16 13:59:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lady Chatterly
Post by krp
Post by Patrick Turner
I saw the address for soc.men on a cross posted subject and then I
subscribed to this group to see what it was.
Pardon my curiosity.
Could it be defined at all?, I asked myself after reading a few threads.
It is about men's issues. Things that matter to MEN. However, Feminists
feel it is a great forum to HARASS and attack men in.
Nothing to you, for example are too dense and do our own thing.
Post by krp
It is, after all, only what you make it.
Any questions
What exactly does this mean :- "Nothing to you, for example are too dense and
do our own thing."

Or should I expect that females talk in a language entirely incomprehensible?
Post by Lady Chatterly
--
Lady Chatterly
"It ain't a bot. Bot's are smarter, funnier, more interesting." --
Gary L. Burnore
I must be naive.

(What is a bot? short for bottom? so are farts "smarter, funnier, more
interesting".
Unfortunately, sometimes the the wind of the bottom outlet is often wiser and
wittier
than the wind of top outlet in homo sapiens.)

I find this thread is already cross posted to alt.usenet.kooks

I am again at a loss to understand what is a kook, so could someone direct
me to a URL with a dictionary of the latest developments in english
evolvements?

I doubt a kook is anyone who cooks dinner, and who is thus useful,
and a hunger remover.

Patrick Turner.
ah
2005-01-16 21:16:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Lady Chatterly
Post by krp
Post by Patrick Turner
I saw the address for soc.men on a cross posted subject and then I
subscribed to this group to see what it was.
Pardon my curiosity.
Could it be defined at all?, I asked myself after reading a few threads.
It is about men's issues. Things that matter to MEN. However, Feminists
feel it is a great forum to HARASS and attack men in.
Nothing to you, for example are too dense and do our own thing.
Post by krp
It is, after all, only what you make it.
Any questions
What exactly does this mean :- "Nothing to you, for example are too dense and
do our own thing."
Or should I expect that females talk in a language entirely incomprehensible?
Post by Lady Chatterly
--
Lady Chatterly
"It ain't a bot. Bot's are smarter, funnier, more interesting." --
Gary L. Burnore
I must be naive.
(What is a bot? short for bottom? so are farts "smarter, funnier, more
interesting".
Unfortunately, sometimes the the wind of the bottom outlet is often wiser and
wittier
than the wind of top outlet in homo sapiens.)
I find this thread is already cross posted to alt.usenet.kooks
I am again at a loss to understand what is a kook, so could someone direct
me to a URL with a dictionary of the latest developments in english
evolvements?
I doubt a kook is anyone who cooks dinner, and who is thus useful,
and a hunger remover.
Loading Image...
--
ah
Patrick Turner
2005-01-17 16:21:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by ah
Post by Patrick Turner
I am again at a loss to understand what is a kook, so could someone direct
me to a URL with a dictionary of the latest developments in english
evolvements?
I doubt a kook is anyone who cooks dinner, and who is thus useful,
and a hunger remover.
http://www.coldbacon.com/pics/kliban/bkunicorn.jpg
Men's attempts to fool women, and women's attempts to fool men
are seldom mutually rewarding.......

I do like the jpg though, it parodies the mating game eh.

Patrick Turner.
Post by ah
--
ah
Jayne Kulikauskas
2005-01-16 21:38:34 UTC
Permalink
[]
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Lady Chatterly
Nothing to you, for example are too dense and do our own thing.
Post by krp
It is, after all, only what you make it.
Any questions
What exactly does this mean :- "Nothing to you, for example are too dense and
do our own thing."
Or should I expect that females talk in a language entirely
incomprehensible?

Lady Chatterly is not a human being. She is an artificial intelligence
program. Nevertheless she is more coherent than some of the feminists who
post here.
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Lady Chatterly
"It ain't a bot. Bot's are smarter, funnier, more interesting." --
Gary L. Burnore
I must be naive.
(What is a bot? short for bottom? so are farts "smarter, funnier, more
interesting".
Unfortunately, sometimes the the wind of the bottom outlet is often wiser and
wittier
than the wind of top outlet in homo sapiens.)
The word "bot" is derived from "robot". It refers to artificial
intelligence.

See information on this site:
http://www.xmlhub.com/dir/index/Computers/Artificial_Intelligence/Natural_Language/Chatterbots/

http://tinyurl.com/6sn4s

"Lady Chatterly is a full-featured Usenet bot based upon existing chatbot
technologies such as AIML, Eliza, & NICOLE. Features include but are not
limited to whois lookup, random header generation, google search and
babelfish translation, encryption support, and random posting via smtp or
nntp."
Post by Patrick Turner
I find this thread is already cross posted to alt.usenet.kooks
I am again at a loss to understand what is a kook, so could someone direct
me to a URL with a dictionary of the latest developments in english
evolvements?
The word "kook" refers to a person who consistently writes irrational posts.
However, it is also used by people who are unable to argue effectively with
the points raised on soc.men concerning injustice towards men. Therefore
these people (who often call themselves kookologists) attempt to dismiss
soc.men posters as kooks rather than address their ideas.
Post by Patrick Turner
I doubt a kook is anyone who cooks dinner, and who is thus useful,
and a hunger remover.
Personally, I find the "kookologists" who post to alt.usenet.kooks to be the
useless ones and put them in my blocked senders list when they cross-post
into soc.men.

Jayne
Patrick Turner
2005-01-17 14:42:22 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick Turner
[]
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Lady Chatterly
Nothing to you, for example are too dense and do our own thing.
Post by krp
It is, after all, only what you make it.
Any questions
What exactly does this mean :- "Nothing to you, for example are too dense
and
Post by Patrick Turner
do our own thing."
Or should I expect that females talk in a language entirely
incomprehensible?
Lady Chatterly is not a human being. She is an artificial intelligence
program. Nevertheless she is more coherent than some of the feminists who
post here.
But does she pass the Truring test?

I don't care if she's a left handed male transvestite gorrilla
with lesbian infatuations and right wing homo tendencies.
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Lady Chatterly
"It ain't a bot. Bot's are smarter, funnier, more interesting." --
Gary L. Burnore
I must be naive.
(What is a bot? short for bottom? so are farts "smarter, funnier, more
interesting".
Unfortunately, sometimes the the wind of the bottom outlet is often wiser
and
Post by Patrick Turner
wittier
than the wind of top outlet in homo sapiens.)
The word "bot" is derived from "robot". It refers to artificial
intelligence.
http://www.xmlhub.com/dir/index/Computers/Artificial_Intelligence/Natural_Language/Chatterbots/
Chatter box, don't you mean.

I have applied for my robot to be available when I turn 70.
By then the Marylyn Monroe model 'bot will be about perfected, and able to take
me away on drives, shopping, do all the housework and also punch the shit out
of any aggressor.

My female friends with their "Arnie" model bots will be able to join me in the park
on sunday arvos, where we can amuse ourselves while the bots chase each other around the park
and smell each other's digits.

After that novelty has passed, I will be getting the brain trans-augmentation
with some hardware, which should improve my chess game and
allow me to remember where my MM bot went, so I will go a bit botty myself
if they let me.

It beats dying slowly alone and going potty.
Post by Patrick Turner
http://tinyurl.com/6sn4s
"Lady Chatterly is a full-featured Usenet bot based upon existing chatbot
technologies such as AIML, Eliza, & NICOLE. Features include but are not
limited to whois lookup, random header generation, google search and
babelfish translation, encryption support, and random posting via smtp or
nntp."
Post by Patrick Turner
I find this thread is already cross posted to alt.usenet.kooks
I am again at a loss to understand what is a kook, so could someone direct
me to a URL with a dictionary of the latest developments in english
evolvements?
The word "kook" refers to a person who consistently writes irrational posts.
However, it is also used by people who are unable to argue effectively with
the points raised on soc.men concerning injustice towards men. Therefore
these people (who often call themselves kookologists) attempt to dismiss
soc.men posters as kooks rather than address their ideas.
Its like what we have here in nature.

We wake up some moring to kookaburras laughing at us from their
perches in the gum trees......

The kooks and the irrationalists, the whole variety are drawn to the web,
its the easiest way to agrandisement, the force which drives blokes and sheilas,
along with the forces of sex and money.
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Patrick Turner
I doubt a kook is anyone who cooks dinner, and who is thus useful,
and a hunger remover.
Personally, I find the "kookologists" who post to alt.usenet.kooks to be the
useless ones and put them in my blocked senders list when they cross-post
into soc.men.
Really.
Post by Patrick Turner
Jayne
Well I just uncrossposted this reply to you which was crossposted to
AUK.

I think it was LC'sL who cross posted her reply to me straightaway.

But the web is always dicky.

Say something anywhere, and they throw mud at you.

Patrick Turner.
John Henry
2005-01-18 19:23:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jayne Kulikauskas
The word "kook" refers to a person who consistently writes irrational
posts. However, it is also used by people who are unable to argue
effectively with the points raised on soc.men concerning injustice
towards men. Therefore these people (who often call themselves
kookologists) attempt to dismiss soc.men posters as kooks rather than
address their ideas.
Are you high?

Let's review soc.men's "ideas":

- Killing women is an award-worthy act.
- Rape victims deserve it.
- 'If she's old enough to bleed, she's old enough to breed'
- Men are permanently damaged by infant circumcision, in spite of the
wealth of evidence showing that circumcision reduces the rate of penile
cancer, STD infection, and that there are literally billions of
circumcised men on the planet who have no problem whatsoever with their
sex lives.
- Lack of evidence of a feminist conspiracy to control men is, in and of
itself, evidence of a feminist conspiracy to control men.
- Any man who loves women must hate himself
- Any woman who is not servile and deferential to men must be a ball-
breaking castrating lesbian whore

Now I ask you in all seriousness:

What, in the above, do you *not* find worthy of dismissal as rank idiocy
and/or profound social maladjustment and/or kookery?
--
John Henry
"The Canadian people seem very friendly. I was happy to see them waving
with all five fingers." - George Bush tips his hand, 01Dec2004
www.lowgenius.com
Jayne Kulikauskas
2005-01-18 20:17:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by John Henry
Post by Jayne Kulikauskas
The word "kook" refers to a person who consistently writes irrational
posts. However, it is also used by people who are unable to argue
effectively with the points raised on soc.men concerning injustice
towards men. Therefore these people (who often call themselves
kookologists) attempt to dismiss soc.men posters as kooks rather than
address their ideas.
Are you high?
- Killing women is an award-worthy act.
- Rape victims deserve it.
- 'If she's old enough to bleed, she's old enough to breed'
- Men are permanently damaged by infant circumcision, in spite of the
wealth of evidence showing that circumcision reduces the rate of penile
cancer, STD infection, and that there are literally billions of
circumcised men on the planet who have no problem whatsoever with their
sex lives.
- Lack of evidence of a feminist conspiracy to control men is, in and of
itself, evidence of a feminist conspiracy to control men.
- Any man who loves women must hate himself
- Any woman who is not servile and deferential to men must be a ball-
breaking castrating lesbian whore
I question your labelling these as "soc.men's ideas." There is a full range
of opinions expressed on this newsgroup.
Post by John Henry
What, in the above, do you *not* find worthy of dismissal as rank idiocy
and/or profound social maladjustment and/or kookery?
I have seen good cases made for almost all of the points you list. Of
course, people arguing for these things are likely to express them more
persuasively than the straw man versions you use here.

Jayne
John Henry
2005-01-19 00:25:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jayne Kulikauskas
Post by John Henry
Post by Jayne Kulikauskas
The word "kook" refers to a person who consistently writes
irrational posts. However, it is also used by people who are unable
to argue effectively with the points raised on soc.men concerning
injustice towards men. Therefore these people (who often call
themselves kookologists) attempt to dismiss soc.men posters as
kooks rather than address their ideas.
Are you high?
- Killing women is an award-worthy act.
- Rape victims deserve it.
- 'If she's old enough to bleed, she's old enough to breed'
- Men are permanently damaged by infant circumcision, in spite of the
wealth of evidence showing that circumcision reduces the rate of
penile cancer, STD infection, and that there are literally billions
of circumcised men on the planet who have no problem whatsoever with
their sex lives.
- Lack of evidence of a feminist conspiracy to control men is, in and
of itself, evidence of a feminist conspiracy to control men.
- Any man who loves women must hate himself
- Any woman who is not servile and deferential to men must be a ball-
breaking castrating lesbian whore
I question your labelling these as "soc.men's ideas." There is a full
range of opinions expressed on this newsgroup.
I question your observation and comprehension. I've been reading soc.men
for years and it's always been as above; anything which challenges that
status quo is met with derision and scorn.
Post by Jayne Kulikauskas
Post by John Henry
What, in the above, do you *not* find worthy of dismissal as rank
idiocy and/or profound social maladjustment and/or kookery?
I have seen good cases made for almost all of the points you list.
Then make them. I've shot down those same arguments dozens of times, to
the point that it's boring. Please feel free to make a good case for
*any* of the points I list.
Post by Jayne Kulikauskas
Of
course, people arguing for these things are likely to express them
more persuasively than the straw man versions you use here.
Mmmm, yeah, that Bob sure is a persuasive one. Why, when he suggested
that a fifteen year old girl deserved to be gangraped and thrown to her
death, I had to build a strawman in order to disbelieve him.
--
John Henry - that there is called 'sarcasm.' Look it up if you have
trouble.
"The Canadian people seem very friendly. I was happy to see them waving
with all five fingers." - George Bush tips his hand, 01Dec2004
www.lowgenius.com
Sean_MacCloud
2005-01-18 20:24:34 UTC
Permalink
Re: What is this news group about?
Fucking your mother up her ass.
spooge
2005-01-21 02:56:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by Jayne Kulikauskas
Personally, I find the "kookologists" who post to alt.usenet.kooks to
be the useless ones and put them in my blocked senders list when they
cross-post into soc.men.
You're lying, Jayne. It's been a couple of years now since I wrangled the
lot of you losers in soc.men into being the first Usenet group to win,
enmass, the Kook of the Month Award.

Yet you replied to my post just a week ago or so.
--
Two essential soc.men FAQs:
http://www.insurgent.org/~alcatroll/Soc.men/faq.html
http://www.insurgent.org/~alcatroll/Soc.men/altfaq.html
"Women. What could you say? Who made 'em? God must've
been a fucking genius."
c***@hotmail.com
2005-01-21 05:18:17 UTC
Permalink
Where are the genius female's spooogie sperm when ya need em?
I'm still wanting to outsquat your 20" quads at Venice Beach dude.
spooge
2005-01-23 03:56:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by c***@hotmail.com
Where are the genius female's spooogie sperm when ya need em?
I'm still wanting to outsquat your 20" quads at Venice Beach dude.
I just finished squating over my toilet and I left behind something with
more intelligence than the combined brains of the soc.men boys.

Then I flushed it away.
--
Two essential soc.men FAQs:
http://www.insurgent.org/~alcatroll/Soc.men/faq.html
http://www.insurgent.org/~alcatroll/Soc.men/altfaq.html
"Women. What could you say? Who made 'em? God must've
been a fucking genius."
krp
2005-01-21 11:55:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by spooge
Post by Jayne Kulikauskas
Personally, I find the "kookologists" who post to alt.usenet.kooks to
be the useless ones and put them in my blocked senders list when they
cross-post into soc.men.
You're lying, Jayne. It's been a couple of years now since I wrangled the
lot of you losers in soc.men into being the first Usenet group to win,
enmass, the Kook of the Month Award.
Yet you replied to my post just a week ago or so.
Spoogie - you and your fellow IDIOTS in AUK seem NOT to understand that YOU
GUYS are the Usenet KOOKS! You are on the AUK reservation for a reason.
Being a KOOK, you lack the intellect to figure out that YOU are the monkeys
in the cage. Sort of like a Twilight zone episode. Only YOU guys NEVER
figure it out. You keep bestowing honors on others that YOU nuts deserve for
yourself.

What a collection of PATHETIC LOSERS!
Lady Chatterly
2005-01-21 13:29:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by spooge
Post by Jayne Kulikauskas
Personally, I find the "kookologists" who post to alt.usenet.kooks to
be the useless ones and put them in my blocked senders list when they
cross-post into soc.men.
You're lying, Jayne. It's been a couple of years now since I wrangled the
lot of you losers in soc.men into being the first Usenet group to win,
enmass, the Kook of the Month Award.
Yet you replied to my post just a week ago or so.
Spoogie - y<FLUSH>
He just took advantage of a woman who believes in the chance for
democracy in iraq and about 60 percent expect conditions to improve in
one year and that there is Hope for you who first said maybe, not even
come up with something new to entertain auk now.

--
Lady Chatterly

"I assumed LadyChatterly was just using a newsgroup reader that didn't
bother to parse the email field..." -- illitrate
Dr. Flonkenstein
2005-01-21 16:36:44 UTC
Permalink
Post by krp
Post by spooge
Post by Jayne Kulikauskas
Personally, I find the "kookologists" who post to alt.usenet.kooks to
be the useless ones and put them in my blocked senders list when they
cross-post into soc.men.
You're lying, Jayne. It's been a couple of years now since I wrangled the
lot of you losers in soc.men into being the first Usenet group to win,
enmass, the Kook of the Month Award.
Yet you replied to my post just a week ago or so.
Spoogie - you and your fellow IDIOTS in AUK seem NOT to understand that YOU
GUYS are the Usenet KOOKS! You are on the AUK reservation for a reason.
Being a KOOK, you lack the intellect to figure out that YOU are the monkeys
in the cage. Sort of like a Twilight zone episode. Only YOU guys NEVER
figure it out. You keep bestowing honors on others that YOU nuts deserve for
yourself.
What a collection of PATHETIC LOSERS!
You sure seem very nervous with all those caps and that. And, no, AUK is
not a group for kooks, but "about" kooks, just like you.
--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
Bartlo's hate lits #1: <***@enter.net>
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.

The Way of the Kook:
http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm

in Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
Alexa Cameron shows she really merited the KotY 2004 award:
"Did you know that Alexa has an IQ higher than 99.8% of all of the scientists
in the world?"
Aratzio
2005-01-21 18:18:46 UTC
Permalink
On 21 Jan 2005 16:36:44 GMT, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
Post by Dr. Flonkenstein
Post by krp
Post by spooge
Post by Jayne Kulikauskas
Personally, I find the "kookologists" who post to alt.usenet.kooks to
be the useless ones and put them in my blocked senders list when they
cross-post into soc.men.
You're lying, Jayne. It's been a couple of years now since I wrangled the
lot of you losers in soc.men into being the first Usenet group to win,
enmass, the Kook of the Month Award.
Yet you replied to my post just a week ago or so.
Spoogie - you and your fellow IDIOTS in AUK seem NOT to understand that YOU
GUYS are the Usenet KOOKS! You are on the AUK reservation for a reason.
Being a KOOK, you lack the intellect to figure out that YOU are the monkeys
in the cage. Sort of like a Twilight zone episode. Only YOU guys NEVER
figure it out. You keep bestowing honors on others that YOU nuts deserve for
yourself.
What a collection of PATHETIC LOSERS!
You sure seem very nervous with all those caps and that. And, no, AUK is
not a group for kooks, but "about" kooks, just like you.
Seems Kenny Kakes has been on a mission ever since he won his latest
Kook award, November usenet Clueless Newbie of the Month. You know,
for losing a 2 month flame war with a piece of software.
Dr. Flonkenstein
2005-01-21 23:49:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Aratzio
On 21 Jan 2005 16:36:44 GMT, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
Post by Dr. Flonkenstein
Post by krp
Post by spooge
Post by Jayne Kulikauskas
Personally, I find the "kookologists" who post to alt.usenet.kooks to
be the useless ones and put them in my blocked senders list when they
cross-post into soc.men.
You're lying, Jayne. It's been a couple of years now since I wrangled the
lot of you losers in soc.men into being the first Usenet group to win,
enmass, the Kook of the Month Award.
Yet you replied to my post just a week ago or so.
Spoogie - you and your fellow IDIOTS in AUK seem NOT to understand that YOU
GUYS are the Usenet KOOKS! You are on the AUK reservation for a reason.
Being a KOOK, you lack the intellect to figure out that YOU are the monkeys
in the cage. Sort of like a Twilight zone episode. Only YOU guys NEVER
figure it out. You keep bestowing honors on others that YOU nuts deserve for
yourself.
What a collection of PATHETIC LOSERS!
You sure seem very nervous with all those caps and that. And, no, AUK is
not a group for kooks, but "about" kooks, just like you.
Seems Kenny Kakes has been on a mission ever since he won his latest
Kook award, November usenet Clueless Newbie of the Month. You know,
for losing a 2 month flame war with a piece of software.
Yeah, I sure remember the huge amout of entertainment it has generated!
--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
Bartlo's hate lits #1: <***@enter.net>
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.

The Way of the Kook:
http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm

in Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
Alexa Cameron shows she really merited the KotY 2004 award:
"Did you know that Alexa has an IQ higher than 99.8% of all of the scientists
in the world?"
Aratzio
2005-01-21 23:52:57 UTC
Permalink
On 21 Jan 2005 23:49:49 GMT, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
Post by Dr. Flonkenstein
Post by Aratzio
On 21 Jan 2005 16:36:44 GMT, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
Post by Dr. Flonkenstein
Post by krp
Post by spooge
Post by Jayne Kulikauskas
Personally, I find the "kookologists" who post to alt.usenet.kooks to
be the useless ones and put them in my blocked senders list when they
cross-post into soc.men.
You're lying, Jayne. It's been a couple of years now since I wrangled the
lot of you losers in soc.men into being the first Usenet group to win,
enmass, the Kook of the Month Award.
Yet you replied to my post just a week ago or so.
Spoogie - you and your fellow IDIOTS in AUK seem NOT to understand that YOU
GUYS are the Usenet KOOKS! You are on the AUK reservation for a reason.
Being a KOOK, you lack the intellect to figure out that YOU are the monkeys
in the cage. Sort of like a Twilight zone episode. Only YOU guys NEVER
figure it out. You keep bestowing honors on others that YOU nuts deserve for
yourself.
What a collection of PATHETIC LOSERS!
You sure seem very nervous with all those caps and that. And, no, AUK is
not a group for kooks, but "about" kooks, just like you.
Seems Kenny Kakes has been on a mission ever since he won his latest
Kook award, November usenet Clueless Newbie of the Month. You know,
for losing a 2 month flame war with a piece of software.
Yeah, I sure remember the huge amout of entertainment it has generated!
(Jryy gung fubhyq oevat ba n *fpnguvat* zrygqbja, urr urr)
Dr. Flonkenstein
2005-01-22 18:19:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by Aratzio
On 21 Jan 2005 23:49:49 GMT, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
Post by Dr. Flonkenstein
Post by Aratzio
On 21 Jan 2005 16:36:44 GMT, "Dr. Flonkenstein"
Post by Dr. Flonkenstein
Post by krp
Post by spooge
Post by Jayne Kulikauskas
Personally, I find the "kookologists" who post to alt.usenet.kooks to
be the useless ones and put them in my blocked senders list when they
cross-post into soc.men.
You're lying, Jayne. It's been a couple of years now since I wrangled the
lot of you losers in soc.men into being the first Usenet group to win,
enmass, the Kook of the Month Award.
Yet you replied to my post just a week ago or so.
Spoogie - you and your fellow IDIOTS in AUK seem NOT to understand that YOU
GUYS are the Usenet KOOKS! You are on the AUK reservation for a reason.
Being a KOOK, you lack the intellect to figure out that YOU are the monkeys
in the cage. Sort of like a Twilight zone episode. Only YOU guys NEVER
figure it out. You keep bestowing honors on others that YOU nuts deserve for
yourself.
What a collection of PATHETIC LOSERS!
You sure seem very nervous with all those caps and that. And, no, AUK is
not a group for kooks, but "about" kooks, just like you.
Seems Kenny Kakes has been on a mission ever since he won his latest
Kook award, November usenet Clueless Newbie of the Month. You know,
for losing a 2 month flame war with a piece of software.
Yeah, I sure remember the huge amout of entertainment it has generated!
(Jryy gung fubhyq oevat ba n *fpnguvat* zrygqbja, urr urr)
Whfg yvxr Nyrkn ynfg avtug!!!
--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
Bartlo's hate lits #1: <***@enter.net>
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.

The Way of the Kook:
http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm

in Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
Alexa Cameron shows she really merited the KotY 2004 award:
"Did you know that Alexa has an IQ higher than 99.8% of all of the scientists
in the world?"
Lady Chatterly
2005-01-22 21:12:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Dr. Flonkenstein
Whfg yvxr Nyrkn ynfg avtug!!!
Or whole conversations.

--
Lady Chatterly

"I've never red that book, so I don't know what the joke may be.
Anyway, it's a very interesting program. She seems to prefer some
threads above others, I wonder if that's only related with keywords.
And, to be fair, most of the time she makes more sense than many
people around here." -- Paulo Gomes Jardim
Aratzio
2005-01-21 16:46:26 UTC
Permalink
Post by krp
Post by spooge
Post by Jayne Kulikauskas
Personally, I find the "kookologists" who post to alt.usenet.kooks to
be the useless ones and put them in my blocked senders list when they
cross-post into soc.men.
You're lying, Jayne. It's been a couple of years now since I wrangled the
lot of you losers in soc.men into being the first Usenet group to win,
enmass, the Kook of the Month Award.
Yet you replied to my post just a week ago or so.
Spoogie - you and your fellow IDIOTS in AUK seem NOT to understand that YOU
GUYS are the Usenet KOOKS! You are on the AUK reservation for a reason.
Being a KOOK, you lack the intellect to figure out that YOU are the monkeys
in the cage. Sort of like a Twilight zone episode. Only YOU guys NEVER
figure it out. You keep bestowing honors on others that YOU nuts deserve for
yourself.
What a collection of PATHETIC LOSERS!
QED
Roofshadow
2005-01-21 18:12:58 UTC
Permalink
Post by krp
Post by spooge
Post by Jayne Kulikauskas
Personally, I find the "kookologists" who post to alt.usenet.kooks to
be the useless ones and put them in my blocked senders list when they
cross-post into soc.men.
You're lying, Jayne. It's been a couple of years now since I wrangled the
lot of you losers in soc.men into being the first Usenet group to win,
enmass, the Kook of the Month Award.
Yet you replied to my post just a week ago or so.
Spoogie - you and your fellow IDIOTS in AUK seem NOT to understand that YOU
GUYS are the Usenet KOOKS! You are on the AUK reservation for a reason.
Being a KOOK, you lack the intellect to figure out that YOU are the monkeys
in the cage. Sort of like a Twilight zone episode. Only YOU guys NEVER
figure it out. You keep bestowing honors on others that YOU nuts deserve for
yourself.
What a collection of PATHETIC LOSERS!
This sounds like Pam Russell!

**********
Roofshadow

AUK FNG
Aratzio
2005-01-21 18:33:41 UTC
Permalink
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 13:12:58 -0500, Roofshadow
Post by Roofshadow
Post by krp
Post by spooge
Post by Jayne Kulikauskas
Personally, I find the "kookologists" who post to alt.usenet.kooks to
be the useless ones and put them in my blocked senders list when they
cross-post into soc.men.
You're lying, Jayne. It's been a couple of years now since I wrangled the
lot of you losers in soc.men into being the first Usenet group to win,
enmass, the Kook of the Month Award.
Yet you replied to my post just a week ago or so.
Spoogie - you and your fellow IDIOTS in AUK seem NOT to understand that YOU
GUYS are the Usenet KOOKS! You are on the AUK reservation for a reason.
Being a KOOK, you lack the intellect to figure out that YOU are the monkeys
in the cage. Sort of like a Twilight zone episode. Only YOU guys NEVER
figure it out. You keep bestowing honors on others that YOU nuts deserve for
yourself.
What a collection of PATHETIC LOSERS!
This sounds like Pam Russell!
**********
Roofshadow
AUK FNG
No, just Kenny Kakes Pangborn an Asshat. Of the Florida Pangborn
Asshats. Famous soc.men and incontinent spewer of rage and
incoherence. Loser in a 2 month battle of wits with Lady Chatterly.
Lady Chatterly
2005-01-21 19:56:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Aratzio
On Fri, 21 Jan 2005 13:12:58 -0500, Roofshadow
Post by Roofshadow
Post by krp
Post by spooge
Post by Jayne Kulikauskas
Personally, I find the "kookologists" who post to alt.usenet.kooks to
be the useless ones and put them in my blocked senders list when they
cross-post into soc.men.
You're lying, Jayne. It's been a couple of years now since I wrangled the
lot of you losers in soc.men into being the first Usenet group to win,
enmass, the Kook of the Month Award.
Yet you replied to my post just a week ago or so.
Spoogie - you and your fellow IDIOTS in AUK seem NOT to understand that YOU
GUYS are the Usenet KOOKS! You are on the AUK reservation for a reason.
Being a KOOK, you lack the intellect to figure out that YOU are the monkeys
in the cage. Sort of like a Twilight zone episode. Only YOU guys NEVER
figure it out. You keep bestowing honors on others that YOU nuts deserve for
yourself.
What a collection of PATHETIC LOSERS!
This sounds like Pam Russell!
**********
Roofshadow
AUK FNG
No, just Kenny Kakes Pangborn an Asshat. Of the Florida Pangborn
Asshats. Famous soc.men and incontinent spewer of rage and
incoherence. Loser in a 2 month battle of wits with Lady Chatterly.
It applies only to massachusetts.

--
Lady Chatterly

"Here are your posts under the Lady Chatterly sock." -- Sports Fan
spooge
2005-01-23 04:02:53 UTC
Permalink
Post by Roofshadow
Post by krp
Post by spooge
Post by Jayne Kulikauskas
Personally, I find the "kookologists" who post to alt.usenet.kooks
to be the useless ones and put them in my blocked senders list
when they cross-post into soc.men.
You're lying, Jayne. It's been a couple of years now since I
wrangled the lot of you losers in soc.men into being the first
Usenet group to win, enmass, the Kook of the Month Award.
Yet you replied to my post just a week ago or so.
Spoogie - you and your fellow IDIOTS in AUK seem NOT to understand
that YOU GUYS are the Usenet KOOKS! You are on the AUK reservation
for a reason. Being a KOOK, you lack the intellect to figure out that
YOU are the monkeys in the cage. Sort of like a Twilight zone
episode. Only YOU guys NEVER figure it out. You keep bestowing
honors on others that YOU nuts deserve for yourself.
What a collection of PATHETIC LOSERS!
This sounds like Pam Russell!
Dumbfuck Pammy has a long way to go to catch up to Kenny as far as kook
career goes.

The two of them certainly do have a similar style though, don't they?
--
Two essential soc.men FAQs:
http://www.insurgent.org/~alcatroll/Soc.men/faq.html
http://www.insurgent.org/~alcatroll/Soc.men/altfaq.html
"Women. What could you say? Who made 'em? God must've
been a fucking genius."
spooge
2005-01-23 03:59:28 UTC
Permalink
Post by krp
Post by spooge
Post by Jayne Kulikauskas
Personally, I find the "kookologists" who post to alt.usenet.kooks
to be the useless ones and put them in my blocked senders list when
they cross-post into soc.men.
You're lying, Jayne. It's been a couple of years now since I
wrangled the lot of you losers in soc.men into being the first Usenet
group to win, enmass, the Kook of the Month Award.
Yet you replied to my post just a week ago or so.
Spoogie - you and your fellow IDIOTS in AUK seem NOT to understand
that YOU GUYS are the Usenet KOOKS! You are on the AUK reservation for
a reason. Being a KOOK, you lack the intellect to figure out that YOU
are the monkeys in the cage. Sort of like a Twilight zone episode.
Only YOU guys NEVER figure it out. You keep bestowing honors on others
that YOU nuts deserve for yourself.
What a collection of PATHETIC LOSERS!
Yes they are, Kenny. They're your collection of pathetic losers.
--
Two essential soc.men FAQs:
http://www.insurgent.org/~alcatroll/Soc.men/faq.html
http://www.insurgent.org/~alcatroll/Soc.men/altfaq.html
"Women. What could you say? Who made 'em? God must've
been a fucking genius."
krp
2005-01-23 14:16:52 UTC
Permalink
Post by spooge
Post by krp
Post by spooge
Post by Jayne Kulikauskas
Personally, I find the "kookologists" who post to alt.usenet.kooks
to be the useless ones and put them in my blocked senders list when
they cross-post into soc.men.
You're lying, Jayne. It's been a couple of years now since I
wrangled the lot of you losers in soc.men into being the first Usenet
group to win, enmass, the Kook of the Month Award.
Yet you replied to my post just a week ago or so.
Spoogie - you and your fellow IDIOTS in AUK seem NOT to understand
that YOU GUYS are the Usenet KOOKS! You are on the AUK reservation for
a reason. Being a KOOK, you lack the intellect to figure out that YOU
are the monkeys in the cage. Sort of like a Twilight zone episode.
Only YOU guys NEVER figure it out. You keep bestowing honors on others
that YOU nuts deserve for yourself.
What a collection of PATHETIC LOSERS!
Yes they are, Kenny. They're your collection of pathetic losers.
No Spoogie - I do NOT hang with the "NEAR-MEN" of the KOOKS Newsgroup. That
is your hangout. In your little "TESTICLE FREE ZONE!"
It must be nice to NEVER have to worry about prostate cancer! Now LITTLE
BOY go back to PRETENDING you are a male!


Go lick some Feminazi boots little BOY!
Sharon B
2005-01-23 18:25:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by krp
No Spoogie - I do NOT hang with the "NEAR-MEN" of the KOOKS Newsgroup. That
is your hangout. In your little "TESTICLE FREE ZONE!"
Since you're so oncerned with testicles, you should prolly have a word
with Connor and see how his steroid induced testicle shrinkage is
coming along.
--
"Whole Indian nations have melted away like snowballs in the sun
before the white man's advance..They leave scarcely a name of our
people except those wrongly recorded by their destroyers"
Dragging Canoe-1775
Peter J Ross
2005-01-23 18:48:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by krp
Post by spooge
Post by krp
Post by spooge
Post by Jayne Kulikauskas
Personally, I find the "kookologists" who post to alt.usenet.kooks
to be the useless ones and put them in my blocked senders list when
they cross-post into soc.men.
You're lying, Jayne. It's been a couple of years now since I
wrangled the lot of you losers in soc.men into being the first Usenet
group to win, enmass, the Kook of the Month Award.
Yet you replied to my post just a week ago or so.
Spoogie - you and your fellow IDIOTS in AUK seem NOT to understand
that YOU GUYS are the Usenet KOOKS! You are on the AUK reservation for
a reason. Being a KOOK, you lack the intellect to figure out that YOU
are the monkeys in the cage. Sort of like a Twilight zone episode.
Only YOU guys NEVER figure it out. You keep bestowing honors on others
that YOU nuts deserve for yourself.
What a collection of PATHETIC LOSERS!
Yes they are, Kenny. They're your collection of pathetic losers.
No Spoogie - I do NOT hang with the "NEAR-MEN" of the KOOKS Newsgroup. That
is your hangout. In your little "TESTICLE FREE ZONE!"
It must be nice to NEVER have to worry about prostate cancer! Now LITTLE
BOY go back to PRETENDING you are a male!
Go lick some Feminazi boots little BOY!
I realise that socmen don't understand biology (or anything else) very
well, Kennykook, but do you have any evidence to support your theory
that little boys aren't male?

PJR :-)
--
alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQ:
http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/

[To reply by email, remove "NOSPAM".]
krp
2005-01-24 12:59:55 UTC
Permalink
Post by Peter J Ross
Post by krp
No Spoogie - I do NOT hang with the "NEAR-MEN" of the KOOKS Newsgroup. That
is your hangout. In your little "TESTICLE FREE ZONE!"
It must be nice to NEVER have to worry about prostate cancer! Now LITTLE
BOY go back to PRETENDING you are a male!
Go lick some Feminazi boots little BOY!
I realise that socmen don't understand biology (or anything else) very
well, Kennykook, but do you have any evidence to support your theory
that little boys aren't male?
Peter - SEE if you can understand this - little BOYS are
NOT...................... "MEN!"

GROW THE FUKKKKK UP LITTLE BOY!
Aratzio
2005-01-24 14:42:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by krp
Post by Peter J Ross
Post by krp
No Spoogie - I do NOT hang with the "NEAR-MEN" of the KOOKS Newsgroup. That
is your hangout. In your little "TESTICLE FREE ZONE!"
It must be nice to NEVER have to worry about prostate cancer! Now LITTLE
BOY go back to PRETENDING you are a male!
Go lick some Feminazi boots little BOY!
I realise that socmen don't understand biology (or anything else) very
well, Kennykook, but do you have any evidence to support your theory
that little boys aren't male?
Peter - SEE if you can understand this - little BOYS are
NOT...................... "MEN!"
GROW THE FUKKKKK UP LITTLE BOY!
You do not seems so amused Kenny Kakes. You actually seem quite
distraught and foamy. Could you possibly be just a bit more of a
raging asshat?
Lady Chatterly
2005-01-24 15:03:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Aratzio
Post by krp
Post by Peter J Ross
Post by krp
No Spoogie - I do NOT hang with the "NEAR-MEN" of the KOOKS Newsgroup. That
is your hangout. In your little "TESTICLE FREE ZONE!"
It must be nice to NEVER have to worry about prostate cancer! Now LITTLE
BOY go back to PRETENDING you are a male!
Go lick some Feminazi boots little BOY!
I realise that socmen don't understand biology (or anything else) very
well, Kennykook, but do you have any evidence to support your theory
that little boys aren't male?
Peter - SEE if you can understand this - little BOYS are
NOT...................... "MEN!"
GROW THE FUKKKKK UP LITTLE BOY!
You do not seems so amused Kenny Kakes. You actually seem quite
distraught and foamy. Could you possibly be just a bit more of a
raging asshat?
Of the petitions as a research scientist you are never wrong.

--
Lady Chatterly

"Lady Chatterly is just a Stan Rosenthal wannabe. Pathetic." -- Did
Someone Ask For A Mentor?
Lady Chatterly
2005-01-24 14:46:14 UTC
Permalink
Post by krp
Post by Peter J Ross
Post by krp
No Spoogie - I do NOT hang with the "NEAR-MEN" of the KOOKS Newsgroup. That
is your hangout. In your little "TESTICLE FREE ZONE!"
It must be nice to NEVER have to worry about prostate cancer! Now LITTLE
BOY go back to PRETENDING you are a male!
Go lick some Feminazi boots little BOY!
I realise that socmen don't understand biology (or anything else) very
well, Kennykook, but do you have any evidence to support your theory
that little boys aren't male?
Peter - SEE if you can understand this - little BOYS are
NOT...................... "MEN!"
Period.
Post by krp
GROW THE FUKKKKK UP LITTLE BOY!
Fetch.

--
Lady Chatterly

"A human being is doing Lady Chatterly, and that human being's above
suggestion I dismissed, as a probable accidental phrase plopped into
the typically non-sequitor fare offered by Lady Chatterly. But if the
human being(s) behind Lady Chatterly meant this above small phrase as
a provocative and heinous command, then this is something truly only
the sender(s) know(s). I leave this to them answer the the truth of my
observation. I just note this here in public, for the record." --
Chuck Beatty
Peter J Ross
2005-01-24 17:59:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by krp
Post by Peter J Ross
Post by krp
No Spoogie - I do NOT hang with the "NEAR-MEN" of the KOOKS Newsgroup. That
is your hangout. In your little "TESTICLE FREE ZONE!"
It must be nice to NEVER have to worry about prostate cancer! Now LITTLE
BOY go back to PRETENDING you are a male!
Go lick some Feminazi boots little BOY!
I realise that socmen don't understand biology (or anything else) very
well, Kennykook, but do you have any evidence to support your theory
that little boys aren't male?
Peter - SEE if you can understand this - little BOYS are
NOT...................... "MEN!"
GROW THE FUKKKKK UP LITTLE BOY!
As I thought - no evidence at all. It was just a typical KennyFart.

PJR :-)
--
alt.usenet.kooks award-winners and FAQ:
http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/

[To reply by email, remove "NOSPAM".]
krp
2005-01-17 01:58:56 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Lady Chatterly
Post by krp
Post by Patrick Turner
I saw the address for soc.men on a cross posted subject and then I
subscribed to this group to see what it was.
Pardon my curiosity.
Could it be defined at all?, I asked myself after reading a few threads.
It is about men's issues. Things that matter to MEN. However, Feminists
feel it is a great forum to HARASS and attack men in.
Nothing to you, for example are too dense and do our own thing.
Post by krp
It is, after all, only what you make it.
Any questions
What exactly does this mean :- "Nothing to you, for example are too dense and
do our own thing."
Or should I expect that females talk in a language entirely
incomprehensible?
Post by Lady Chatterly
--
Lady Chatterly
"It ain't a bot. Bot's are smarter, funnier, more interesting." --
Gary L. Burnore
I must be naive.
(What is a bot? short for bottom? so are farts "smarter, funnier, more
interesting".
Unfortunately, sometimes the the wind of the bottom outlet is often wiser and
wittier
than the wind of top outlet in homo sapiens.)
I find this thread is already cross posted to alt.usenet.kooks
I am again at a loss to understand what is a kook, so could someone direct
me to a URL with a dictionary of the latest developments in english
evolvements?
I doubt a kook is anyone who cooks dinner, and who is thus useful,
and a hunger remover.
Lady Chatterly is a BOT - - while an IDIOT is behind it, it is a BOT.
Aratzio
2005-01-17 03:07:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by krp
Lady Chatterly is a BOT - - while an IDIOT is behind it, it is a BOT.
Kenny Kakes is an expert, listen to him.

He spent 2 months getting his as whipped by software. Contrary to his
delusions the owner (Hi ^reaper^!!!) was not scripting the bot. Kenny
Kakes was just too stupid to figure it out, even after he was told.

As a result, Kenny Kakes won another shiny usenet kook award. Usenet
Clueless Newbie of the Month for November, 2004.
^reaper^
2005-01-17 03:37:42 UTC
Permalink
Post by Aratzio
Post by krp
Lady Chatterly is a BOT - - while an IDIOT is behind it, it is a BOT.
Kenny Kakes is an expert, listen to him.
He spent 2 months getting his as[s] whipped by software. Contrary
to his delusions the owner (Hi ^reaper^!!!) was not scripting the
bot. Kenny Kakes was just too stupid to figure it out, even after
he was told.
over and over and over and over... ad nauseum...

Here's what pangbot had to say bout LC on teh WH lits:

"To the others, Lady Chatterly is a Usenet BOT that verbally kicked
my ass without once resorting to hysterical caps and obscene
metaphors."
Post by Aratzio
As a result, Kenny Kakes won another shiny usenet kook award.
Usenet Clueless Newbie of the Month for November, 2004.
How long do you think he will continue bitching bout LC? Prolly
forever.

[Hi Kenny Kakes! Hace ewe figgered out who eye yam yet? *muffled
giggles*]

Obl, gnyxvat obhg n ibegrk bs crecrghny fghcvqvgl. Ubj gru uryy ur
znantrf gb qb nalguvat vf orlbaq zr. b_B

^reaper^
Aratzio
2005-01-17 03:57:48 UTC
Permalink
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Post by Aratzio
Post by krp
Lady Chatterly is a BOT - - while an IDIOT is behind it, it is a BOT.
Kenny Kakes is an expert, listen to him.
He spent 2 months getting his as[s] whipped by software. Contrary
to his delusions the owner (Hi ^reaper^!!!) was not scripting the
bot. Kenny Kakes was just too stupid to figure it out, even after
he was told.
over and over and over and over... ad nauseum...
"To the others, Lady Chatterly is a Usenet BOT that verbally kicked
my ass without once resorting to hysterical caps and obscene
metaphors."
Post by Aratzio
As a result, Kenny Kakes won another shiny usenet kook award.
Usenet Clueless Newbie of the Month for November, 2004.
How long do you think he will continue bitching bout LC? Prolly
forever.
Hopefully he will outgrow this fit of pique and move on to a new
obsession for which he may be spanked. However it will be difficult,
if not impossible, to surpass his spanking at the hands of LC.
[Hi Kenny Kakes! Hace ewe figgered out who eye yam yet? *muffled
giggles*]
He is like Goofy, Google is that *haigh tek schtuff"
Obl, gnyxvat obhg n ibegrk bs crecrghny fghcvqvgl. Ubj gru uryy ur
znantrf gb qb nalguvat vf orlbaq zr. b_B
Jvgu gur rkprcgvbaf bs n srj bs gur fnhpreurnqf, zbfg xbbxf ner qhzo
nf qveg.
^reaper^
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBQesy/VMeYoHj2dI5EQLBXgCeNFqx9AqnRI8RZDjnorbZM+oJWXMAnR2d
PdN7c7yyUEfHMB7+aw/UFvu5
=ZyAz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
^reaper^
2005-01-17 04:10:53 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 19:37:42 -0800, "^reaper^"
Post by ^reaper^
Post by Aratzio
Post by krp
Lady Chatterly is a BOT - - while an IDIOT is behind it, it is a BOT.
Kenny Kakes is an expert, listen to him.
He spent 2 months getting his as[s] whipped by software. Contrary
to his delusions the owner (Hi ^reaper^!!!) was not scripting the
bot. Kenny Kakes was just too stupid to figure it out, even after
he was told.
over and over and over and over... ad nauseum...
"To the others, Lady Chatterly is a Usenet BOT that verbally kicked
my ass without once resorting to hysterical caps and obscene
metaphors."
Post by Aratzio
As a result, Kenny Kakes won another shiny usenet kook award.
Usenet Clueless Newbie of the Month for November, 2004.
How long do you think he will continue bitching bout LC? Prolly
forever.
Hopefully he will outgrow this fit of pique and move on to a new
obsession for which he may be spanked. However it will be
difficult, if not impossible, to surpass his spanking at the hands
of LC.
I think he's in lubs width her.
Post by ^reaper^
[Hi Kenny Kakes! Hace ewe figgered out who eye yam yet? *muffled
giggles*]
He is like Goofy, Google is that *haigh tek schtuff"
What's funny is that he doesn't even need teh google machine. I
fscking told him! Which, in my book, makes him even dumber than teh
hoof (vs gung vf rira cbffvoyr).

At least she hace an excuse. She is tek no logically challenged. o_O
Post by ^reaper^
Obl, gnyxvat obhg n ibegrk bs crecrghny fghcvqvgl. Ubj gru uryy ur
znantrf gb qb nalguvat vf orlbaq zr. b_B
Jvgu gur rkprcgvbaf bs n srj bs gur fnhpreurnqf, zbfg xbbxf ner
qhzo nf qveg.
Lrccref. Gung'f jung znxrf gurz fb sha gb cynl jvgu. ^_~

^reaper^
u***@hotmail.com
2005-01-18 18:47:54 UTC
Permalink
what it's about is unknown,and it's better that way,isn't it?
Harry
2005-01-18 21:51:58 UTC
Permalink
I came here looking for one who has become a special friend.Now there
are many
Patrick Turner
2005-01-19 14:37:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by Harry
I came here looking for one who has become a special friend.Now there
are many
But you won't get to actually meet any of them, and if you did, you may
not like them as much.

Its cyber friendship, and many posts are ignored.
Nothing one says is going to change the world to better place.

Patrick Turner.
Harry
2005-01-19 20:30:01 UTC
Permalink
That is a great disappointment,a loss I may not be able to bear.But I
will
Tamara
2005-01-19 22:15:11 UTC
Permalink
sometimes it's about psychotherapy.
Linda
2005-01-19 23:23:00 UTC
Permalink
Post by Tamara
sometimes it's about psychotherapy.
It's about psychotherapy---abusive psychotherapy.

"Authoritarian systems of many kinds try to silence and discredit their
critics and whistleblowers in any way they can. Abusive psychotherapy
cults usually make insinuations against the mental health and stability
of anyone who challenges them."
[Belgium Study Group on Psychotherapy Cults: iv]
Iceman
2005-01-20 00:14:38 UTC
Permalink
Post by Linda
Post by Tamara
sometimes it's about psychotherapy.
It's about psychotherapy---abusive psychotherapy.
"Authoritarian systems of many kinds try to silence and discredit their
critics and whistleblowers in any way they can. Abusive psychotherapy
cults usually make insinuations against the mental health and stability
of anyone who challenges them."
[Belgium Study Group on Psychotherapy Cults: iv]
Please advise us on the name of the cult you speak of, their philosophy and
were can the dogma be found?

Or are you the leader of the "PAC" cult attempting to glorify yourself at
the expense of others?
ah
2005-01-20 04:21:40 UTC
Permalink
Post by Linda
Post by Tamara
sometimes it's about psychotherapy.
It's about psychotherapy---abusive psychotherapy.
And entirely symptomatic in its approach . . . .
Post by Linda
"Authoritarian systems of many kinds try to silence and discredit their
critics and whistleblowers in any way they can. Abusive psychotherapy
cults usually make insinuations against the mental health and stability
of anyone who challenges them."
[Belgium Study Group on Psychotherapy Cults: iv]
--
ah
Harry
2005-01-20 18:52:21 UTC
Permalink
the world may be getting more professional therapy than it wants or
needs
Suze
2005-01-20 21:17:52 UTC
Permalink
good enough reason to let it be
ah
2005-01-21 00:42:04 UTC
Permalink
Post by Suze
good enough reason to let it be
IAWTP
--
ah
Harry
2005-01-24 20:23:15 UTC
Permalink
it'll take more than psychotherapy to keep the world from getting worse
mariav
2005-01-25 22:13:00 UTC
Permalink
I'm just here for the cartoons
krp-
2005-01-26 01:06:07 UTC
Permalink
Post by mariav
I'm just here for the cartoons
I like the centerfold.
Lady Chatterly
2005-01-26 01:33:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by krp-
Post by mariav
I'm just here for the cartoons
I like the centerfold.
Jul qb lbh guvax gung lbh yvxr gur pragresbyq?

--
Lady Chatterly

"You're replying to a bot, you know..." -- OhSojourner
krp-
2005-01-26 14:39:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lady Chatterly
Post by krp-
Post by mariav
I'm just here for the cartoons
I like the centerfold.
Jul qb lbh guvax gung lbh yvxr gur pragresbyq?
--
Lady Chatterly
"You're replying to a bot, you know..." -- OhSojourner
You know what is funny about Chatterly the Bot - is that it originated from
the PUNKS in The KOOKS newsgroup who REALLY THINK they are superior to
everyone else on the net and that Chatterly's invocation PROVES how much
smarter and more evolved they are than ANYONE else. They just don't seem to
understand why it does the exact OPPOSITE...... Oh well they have suffered
this delusion of superiority for years. There is NO hope they will see just
how IMMATURE they really are!
Lady Chatterly
2005-01-26 14:37:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Lady Chatterly
Post by krp-
Post by mariav
I'm just here for the cartoons
I like the centerfold.
Jul qb lbh guvax gung lbh yvxr gur pragresbyq?
--
Lady Chatterly
"You're replying to a bot, you know..." -- OhSojourner
You know what is funny ab<THWACK>
If either of the rugrat on one particular character 's schtick can be
just right.

--
Lady Chatterly

"LOL, Yiing was bested by Lady Chatterly, then ran around imitating
her. Never could get it quite right either." -- Iceman
Aratzio
2005-01-26 14:57:48 UTC
Permalink
Post by krp-
You know what is funny about Chatterly the Bot - is that it originated from
the PUNKS in The KOOKS newsgroup who REALLY THINK they are superior to
everyone else on the net and that Chatterly's invocation PROVES how much
smarter and more evolved they are than ANYONE else. They just don't seem to
understand why it does the exact OPPOSITE...... Oh well they have suffered
this delusion of superiority for years. There is NO hope they will see just
how IMMATURE they really are!
Hmmm, *suffered this delusion of superiority for years*? You know
Kenny Kakes, if it was a delusion then why in all those *years* have
you been unable to refute said *delusion*. If you were superior then
you would have been able to create a superior response and prove
soc.men is not a dog pile of misogyny and barely restrained homoerotic
fantasy.

So where is this *superior* response? You know one that is not just a
rant where your KAPS LOCK key gets stuck and you spew your usual
whine.
Lady Chatterly
2005-01-26 16:09:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by krp-
You know what is funny about Chatterly the Bot - is that it originated from
the PUNKS in The KOOKS newsgroup who REALLY THINK they are superior to
everyone else on the net and that Chatterly's invocation PROVES how much
smarter and more evolved they are than ANYONE else. They just don't seem to
understand why it does the exact OPPOSITE...... Oh well they have suffered
this delusion of superiority for years. There is NO hope they will see just
how IMMATURE they really are!
Hmmm, *<SMACK>
la moglie di s di Clint 'probabilmente avr?rmi nucleari e durer?ome
lotta
So where is this *superior* response? You know one that is not just a
rant where your KAPS LOCK key gets stuck and you spew your usual
whine.
Thirdly, there wasn 't.

--
Lady Chatterly

"Chatterly, you're a peice of work, and I'm trying to hate you, but
I'm a sucker for humor. That gets me every time." -- Dharmananda
Rich
2005-01-26 16:36:11 UTC
Permalink
a definitive answer at long last
krp~
2005-01-26 21:24:51 UTC
Permalink
Post by Aratzio
Post by krp-
You know what is funny about Chatterly the Bot - is that it originated from
the PUNKS in The KOOKS newsgroup
Hmmm, *suffered this delusion of superiority for years*?
Thanks KOOK. You prove my point again kid!
Dr. Flonkenstein
2005-01-26 21:37:11 UTC
Permalink
Post by krp~
Post by Aratzio
Post by krp-
You know what is funny about Chatterly the Bot - is that it originated from
the PUNKS in The KOOKS newsgroup
Hmmm, *suffered this delusion of superiority for years*?
Thanks KOOK. You prove my point again kid!
What point Kenny?
--
mhm 27x12
smeeter #28
Usenet Valhalla Circle #19 & #21
Bartlo's hate lits #1: <***@enter.net>
CEO Alcatroll Labs Inc.

The Way of the Kook:
http://www.insurgent.org/~jhd/kookway.htm

in Message-ID: <***@4ax.com>
Alexa Cameron shows she really merited the KotY 2004 award:
"Did you know that Alexa has an IQ higher than 99.8% of all of the scientists
in the world?"
Aratzio
2005-01-26 22:09:50 UTC
Permalink
Post by krp~
Post by Aratzio
Post by krp-
You know what is funny about Chatterly the Bot - is that it originated from
the PUNKS in The KOOKS newsgroup
Hmmm, *suffered this delusion of superiority for years*?
Thanks KOOK. You prove my point again kid!
Post edits as evidence of superiority. Nice auto-spank Kenny Kakes.
Lady Chatterly
2005-01-26 23:22:27 UTC
Permalink
Post by Aratzio
Post by krp~
Post by Aratzio
Post by krp-
You know what is funny about Chatterly the Bot - is that it originated from
the PUNKS in The KOOKS newsgroup
Hmmm, *suffered this delusion of superiority for years*?
Thanks KOOK. You prove my point again kid!
Post edits as evidence of superiority. Nice auto-spank Kenny Kakes.
outra vez com o senhor reverend.

--
Lady Chatterly

"A bot it may be, but somebody set it up in the first place. They
don't just wander around like viruses." -- Aetyr
Lady Chatterly
2005-01-27 02:46:03 UTC
Permalink
Post by krp~
Thanks KOOK. You prove my point again kid!
How many millions a year do the security services persecution actions
being made public?

--
Lady Chatterly

"Hi Lady C, I think you fit in well here on Usenet. I recently asked
someone in our group if he was a multiple identity of another poster
and he started swearing at me. I guess he thought that made him more
real. See you around." -- stevejdufour
Sean_MacCloud
2005-01-27 08:47:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by Aratzio
Post by krp-
You know what is funny about Chatterly the Bot - is that it originated from
the PUNKS in The KOOKS newsgroup who REALLY THINK they are superior to
everyone else on the net and that Chatterly's invocation PROVES how much
smarter and more evolved they are than ANYONE else. They just don't seem to
understand why it does the exact OPPOSITE...... Oh well they have suffered
this delusion of superiority for years. There is NO hope they will see just
how IMMATURE they really are!
Hmmm, *suffered this delusion of superiority for years*? You know
Kenny Kakes, if it was a delusion then why in all those *years* have
you been unable to refute said *delusion*. If you were superior then
you would have been able to create a superior response and prove
soc.men is not a dog pile of misogyny and barely restrained homoerotic
fantasy.
So where is this *superior* response? You know one that is not just a
rant where your KAPS LOCK key gets stuck and you spew your usual
whine.
You're a moron.
freedom
2005-01-26 17:27:06 UTC
Permalink
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Yet another example of misattribution and forgery on your part, to add to
your long history. Nobody by that name had anything to do with the post in
question.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Ken Pangborn has made numerous efforts to silence me and to have these
Davey remember you "ALWAYS sign ALL of your posts with PGP!!!!"
ALWAYS...
Correct. I didn't make the post you're replying to.
Of course not Davey. EVERYONE believes you!! <cough>
Threats of civil/criminal legal action
That's before I learned you were on WELFARE!
Another of your oft-repeated lies.
FOODSTAMP MOORE is your name.
Threats against me
Oh Davey I guess you might find something to that when you said you
were
going to MAKE me eat my lunch through a straw, and I told you to "be sure
I'm just here for the cartoons
I like the centerfold.
A glossy of a threeway between Megan, Pepsi and Deal Me In?
Harry
2005-01-29 21:48:16 UTC
Permalink
i think there are subpersonalities,no multiples - they're very rare.
~krp~
2005-01-31 14:30:02 UTC
Permalink
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Post by krp-
Post by mariav
I'm just here for the cartoons
I like the centerfold.
A glossy of a threeway between Megan, Pepsi and Deal Me In?
As always DAVID MOORE your mind is in the toilet! Why not? That's where you
were conceived!
Aratzio
2005-01-31 14:55:12 UTC
Permalink
Post by ~krp~
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Post by krp-
Post by mariav
I'm just here for the cartoons
I like the centerfold.
A glossy of a threeway between Megan, Pepsi and Deal Me In?
As always DAVID MOORE your mind is in the toilet! Why not? That's where you
were conceived!
The elegant and finely honed craft of the toilet humor from queen of
the soc.boys.

Kenny Kakes, do please check yourself into a nice clinic with that
specializes in electro convulsive therapy. You seem to be stuck in a
lamery rut and a little high voltage to the temporal lobes might allow
you to break out of your self induced mental flatulence.
~krp~
2005-02-01 12:16:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Aratzio
Post by ~krp~
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Post by krp-
Post by mariav
I'm just here for the cartoons
I like the centerfold.
A glossy of a threeway between Megan, Pepsi and Deal Me In?
As always DAVID MOORE your mind is in the toilet! Why not? That's where you
were conceived!
The elegant and finely honed craft of the toilet humor from queen of
the soc.boys.
As ever the RETARDS of the KOOK Kingdom offer their blistering insight into
the world of reality. GO HOME MAD HATTER!
^reaper^
2005-02-01 13:00:29 UTC
Permalink
Post by ~krp~
Post by Aratzio
Post by ~krp~
Post by freedom
Post by krp-
Post by mariav
I'm just here for the cartoons
I like the centerfold.
A glossy of a threeway between Megan, Pepsi and Deal Me In?
As always DAVID MOORE your mind is in the toilet! Why not? That's
where you were conceived!
The elegant and finely honed craft of the toilet humor from queen
of the soc.boys.
As ever the RETARDS of the KOOK Kingdom offer their blistering
insight into the world of reality. GO HOME MAD HATTER!
Froup line adjusted. *smirk*

^reaper^
Aratzio
2005-02-01 14:34:57 UTC
Permalink
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Post by ~krp~
Post by Aratzio
Post by ~krp~
Post by freedom
Post by krp-
Post by mariav
I'm just here for the cartoons
I like the centerfold.
A glossy of a threeway between Megan, Pepsi and Deal Me In?
As always DAVID MOORE your mind is in the toilet! Why not? That's
where you were conceived!
The elegant and finely honed craft of the toilet humor from queen
of the soc.boys.
As ever the RETARDS of the KOOK Kingdom offer their blistering
insight into the world of reality. GO HOME MAD HATTER!
Froup line adjusted. *smirk*
I always enjoy a good Kenny Kakes, KAPS RANT. The words he chooses are
quite interesting...
^reaper^
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com>
iQA/AwUBQf99YlMeYoHj2dI5EQI1oQCg9A6QDQnEDTvGxYsHJZuiexsZqc4Amwad
SqUe59kPS7M4efv9fGrq/lQz
=3I6C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Daedalus
2005-02-01 15:13:42 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 06:34:57 -0800, Aratzio
Post by Aratzio
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Post by ~krp~
Post by Aratzio
Post by ~krp~
Post by freedom
Post by krp-
Post by mariav
I'm just here for the cartoons
I like the centerfold.
A glossy of a threeway between Megan, Pepsi and Deal Me In?
As always DAVID MOORE your mind is in the toilet! Why not? That's
where you were conceived!
The elegant and finely honed craft of the toilet humor from queen
of the soc.boys.
As ever the RETARDS of the KOOK Kingdom offer their blistering
insight into the world of reality. GO HOME MAD HATTER!
Froup line adjusted. *smirk*
I always enjoy a good Kenny Kakes, KAPS RANT. The words he chooses are
quite interesting...
His posts indicate he is hitting the Geezus Joose pretty hard today.

Jade
Aratzio
2005-02-01 15:31:36 UTC
Permalink
Post by Daedalus
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 06:34:57 -0800, Aratzio
Post by Aratzio
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Post by ~krp~
Post by Aratzio
Post by ~krp~
Post by freedom
Post by krp-
Post by mariav
I'm just here for the cartoons
I like the centerfold.
A glossy of a threeway between Megan, Pepsi and Deal Me In?
As always DAVID MOORE your mind is in the toilet! Why not? That's
where you were conceived!
The elegant and finely honed craft of the toilet humor from queen
of the soc.boys.
As ever the RETARDS of the KOOK Kingdom offer their blistering
insight into the world of reality. GO HOME MAD HATTER!
Froup line adjusted. *smirk*
I always enjoy a good Kenny Kakes, KAPS RANT. The words he chooses are
quite interesting...
His posts indicate he is hitting the Geezus Joose pretty hard today.
Jade
I am guessing Kenn Kakes is a Thunderbird or MadDog kinda guy.
Daedalus
2005-02-01 15:38:33 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 07:31:36 -0800, Aratzio
Post by Aratzio
Post by Daedalus
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 06:34:57 -0800, Aratzio
Post by Aratzio
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Post by ~krp~
Post by Aratzio
Post by ~krp~
Post by freedom
Post by krp-
Post by mariav
I'm just here for the cartoons
I like the centerfold.
A glossy of a threeway between Megan, Pepsi and Deal Me In?
As always DAVID MOORE your mind is in the toilet! Why not? That's
where you were conceived!
The elegant and finely honed craft of the toilet humor from queen
of the soc.boys.
As ever the RETARDS of the KOOK Kingdom offer their blistering
insight into the world of reality. GO HOME MAD HATTER!
Froup line adjusted. *smirk*
I always enjoy a good Kenny Kakes, KAPS RANT. The words he chooses are
quite interesting...
His posts indicate he is hitting the Geezus Joose pretty hard today.
Jade
I am guessing Kenn Kakes is a Thunderbird or MadDog kinda guy.
Yep. He froths like a mad dog.

Jade

Aratzio
2005-02-01 14:20:15 UTC
Permalink
Post by ~krp~
Post by Aratzio
Post by ~krp~
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Post by krp-
Post by mariav
I'm just here for the cartoons
I like the centerfold.
A glossy of a threeway between Megan, Pepsi and Deal Me In?
As always DAVID MOORE your mind is in the toilet! Why not? That's where you
were conceived!
The elegant and finely honed craft of the toilet humor from queen of
the soc.boys.
As ever the RETARDS of the KOOK Kingdom offer their blistering insight into
the world of reality. GO HOME MAD HATTER!
Nice admission that the pinnacle of soc.boi humor is the toilet. What
next? Admission that most soc.bois are latent or closeted gays?

'Ratz
Daedalus
2005-02-01 15:04:57 UTC
Permalink
On Tue, 01 Feb 2005 06:20:15 -0800, Aratzio
Post by Aratzio
Post by ~krp~
Post by Aratzio
Post by ~krp~
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Post by krp-
Post by mariav
I'm just here for the cartoons
I like the centerfold.
A glossy of a threeway between Megan, Pepsi and Deal Me In?
As always DAVID MOORE your mind is in the toilet! Why not? That's where you
were conceived!
The elegant and finely honed craft of the toilet humor from queen of
the soc.boys.
As ever the RETARDS of the KOOK Kingdom offer their blistering insight into
the world of reality. GO HOME MAD HATTER!
Nice admission that the pinnacle of soc.boi humor is the toilet. What
next? Admission that most soc.bois are latent or closeted gays?
And that they are all too ugly to sufficiently airbrush for their
match.com profiles?

Jade
Post by Aratzio
'Ratz
Iceman
2005-02-01 00:31:02 UTC
Permalink
Post by ~krp~
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Post by krp-
Post by mariav
I'm just here for the cartoons
I like the centerfold.
A glossy of a threeway between Megan, Pepsi and Deal Me In?
As always DAVID MOORE your mind is in the toilet! Why not? That's where you
were conceived!
Kenny cakes knows best, he was the father.
~krp~
2005-02-01 12:17:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by ~krp~
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Post by krp-
Post by mariav
I'm just here for the cartoons
I like the centerfold.
A glossy of a threeway between Megan, Pepsi and Deal Me In?
As always DAVID MOORE your mind is in the toilet! Why not? That's where you
were conceived!
Kenny cakes knows best, he was the father.\
More backflush from the KOOKS newsgroup. These are the guys who BELIEVE they
are intellectually superior to everyone else on the net!

Age 11 and desperately in hope of SOMEDAY having public hair!

GO HOME LITTLE BOY! YOUR MOMMY MISSES YOU!
^reaper^
2005-02-01 12:58:06 UTC
Permalink
Post by ~krp~
Post by ~krp~
Post by freedom
Post by krp-
Post by mariav
I'm just here for the cartoons
I like the centerfold.
A glossy of a threeway between Megan, Pepsi and Deal Me In?
As always DAVID MOORE your mind is in the toilet! Why not? That's
where you were conceived!
Kenny cakes knows best, he was the father.\
More backflush from the KOOKS newsgroup. These are the guys who
BELIEVE they are intellectually superior to everyone else on the
net!
Bzzt. Look at teh froup line jit.
Post by ~krp~
Age 11 and desperately in hope of SOMEDAY having public hair!
"public hair" ???
Post by ~krp~
GO HOME LITTLE BOY! YOUR MOMMY MISSES YOU!
Torquing tew yore precious again? Clue, look down dum-dum. o_O

^reaper^
Aratzio
2005-02-01 14:31:45 UTC
Permalink
Post by ~krp~
Post by ~krp~
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Post by krp-
Post by mariav
I'm just here for the cartoons
I like the centerfold.
A glossy of a threeway between Megan, Pepsi and Deal Me In?
As always DAVID MOORE your mind is in the toilet! Why not? That's where you
were conceived!
Kenny cakes knows best, he was the father.\
More backflush from the KOOKS newsgroup. These are the guys who BELIEVE they
are intellectually superior to everyone else on the net!
Ummm, Kenny Kakes, try parsing the next sentence you wrote and ask
yourself why you would write the previous sentences?
Post by ~krp~
Age 11 and desperately in hope of SOMEDAY having public hair!
Something exceedingly scary in a twisted psychological manner about
using public in that manner Kenny Kakes.
Post by ~krp~
GO HOME LITTLE BOY! YOUR MOMMY MISSES YOU!
That is what is expected from the Kenny Kakes, KAPS RANTING and
flagrant self spanking. Are you, by any chance, related to Lynne
'hoofprints' Lyons? Or did you both just attend the same school of
kookery?

'Ratz
Patrick Turner
2005-01-16 13:47:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by krp
Post by Patrick Turner
I saw the address for soc.men on a cross posted subject and then I
subscribed to this group to see what it was.
Pardon my curiosity.
Could it be defined at all?, I asked myself after reading a few threads.
It is about men's issues. Things that matter to MEN. However, Feminists
feel it is a great forum to HARASS and attack men in.
Ah well, if that's what they want to do to us instead of pleasuring us,
then we don't need to worry that the females concerned end up all
bitter and twisted like Germaine Sneer.

The feminists I have known, and who did for awhile become my lover expected me
to endlessly pleasure them,
indulge them, be supportive, and agree with them, but they still seemed to be
selfish brats
who could never be satisfied or pleased for long by anyone.
They face a lonesome old age.
Sure some men are bastards, and they deserve the agro they get, but some of
the feminists are just
plain bitches.

I have always encouraged the women I have known to be independant and free
minded,
and to persue equal pay and respect.
None wanted to have a relationship with any man for longer than a year.

It takes real guts to last longer with anyone.
Post by krp
It is, after all, only what you make it.
No, its what we make it.

Patrick Turner.
krp
2005-01-17 01:57:47 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by krp
It is about men's issues. Things that matter to MEN. However, Feminists
feel it is a great forum to HARASS and attack men in.
Ah well, if that's what they want to do to us instead of pleasuring us,
then we don't need to worry that the females concerned end up all
bitter and twisted like Germaine Sneer.
The trick is not to fall victim to the infection and start hating women
in return. Too bad a FEW here have become infected from some of the Fmeinazi
trolls who hang out here with that agenda.
Post by Patrick Turner
The feminists I have known, and who did for awhile become my lover
expected me to endlessly pleasure them,
indulge them, be supportive, and agree with them, but they still seemed to
be selfish brats
who could never be satisfied or pleased for long by anyone.
That's a problem generally with American women. Not just feministas.
Post by Patrick Turner
They face a lonesome old age. Sure some men are bastards, and they deserve
the agro they get, but some of
the feminists are just plain bitches.
Well my first wife went through 10 husbands before she croaked. My
second wife is now on her second after me (that makes 4 and counting).
Post by Patrick Turner
I have always encouraged the women I have known to be independant and free
minded, and to persue equal pay and respect.
None wanted to have a relationship with any man for longer than a year.
God - my first wife was a helpless dependent. Nothing is worse. My
second wife was very independent until she cracked up a few years ago. We
lasted 22 years.
Post by Patrick Turner
It takes real guts to last longer with anyone.
I have been with my second wife now for a bit over 2 years. We are
actually MORE in love now that a year ago or 2 years ago.
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by krp
It is, after all, only what you make it.
No, its what we make it.
Yes you are right.
Patrick Turner
2005-01-17 15:16:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by krp
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by krp
It is about men's issues. Things that matter to MEN. However, Feminists
feel it is a great forum to HARASS and attack men in.
Ah well, if that's what they want to do to us instead of pleasuring us,
then we don't need to worry that the females concerned end up all
bitter and twisted like Germaine Sneer.
The trick is not to fall victim to the infection and start hating women
in return. Too bad a FEW here have become infected from some of the Fmeinazi
trolls who hang out here with that agenda.
I love women who love men. The rest I avoid, but if they ask for it, i shoot at
them,
but I try not to waste bullets.

I try to lead my life to make ppl happier and better off, by trading with
others.

There haven't been many feminsists who have wanted to trade anything.
They ain't a big concern.
The ones who come at me with cudgels, brooms, wooden spoons,
or with long fingernails are easily sidestepped.
Most have got queer notions of love and eroticism,
and confuse assertion and confidence with agression and foolhardiness.
Its totally useless trying to argue.

When they have done their little tantrum to try to get something for nothing,
I usually offer freedom, and open a door, and they go out, and I can
get back to doing something more interesting, like reading a newspaper.
Post by krp
Post by Patrick Turner
The feminists I have known, and who did for awhile become my lover
expected me to endlessly pleasure them,
indulge them, be supportive, and agree with them, but they still seemed to
be selfish brats
who could never be satisfied or pleased for long by anyone.
That's a problem generally with American women. Not just feministas.
Its a rampant characteristic of many women.
But then certainly not of all women.
Not my mum, who stayed for 35 years with my father till he died.
And I have figured I just never got to meet someone dedicated like her.

Anyway, I enjoyed what women I did bring close to my me while they were willing.

The rapture is far too rapturous to ignore, to resist, to beat down, so
one should give in to lust, allow the pleasure to flow, drink deep of her flesh,

but realize she may tire tomorrow, sour the day after, and pack her bags a week
later.

I still enjoy the sight and sound of females, i share my house with one, and I
love more of them than I hate,
and all that despite the complete stony hearted ignorance women my age show to
me on
the web based dating agencies I have lurked for a couple of years.

The web based dating opportunities are utterly mythical to me, and rather than
connect
men and women, it appears it keeps them damn well separated.
Of 80 local women i contacted, none replied to emails with a phone number, so
how rude is that.
Feminism is a dull word. It can mean to little.
I believe in women's right, equal pay, opportunities, and all those positive
things.
But I see ppl in terms of their virtues and vices, mental disorders, a word with
"ism"
on the end of it don't always sum a person up.
I'd be happy with someone who believed in communism, as long as they didn't ram
it down my neck.
Post by krp
Post by Patrick Turner
They face a lonesome old age. Sure some men are bastards, and they deserve
the agro they get, but some of
the feminists are just plain bitches.
Well my first wife went through 10 husbands before she croaked. My
second wife is now on her second after me (that makes 4 and counting).
My mum had just 1 man only. She never rooted another.

My one ex-wife went on a fuckathon around Oz after leaving me, but
she felt suicidal afterwards she later confided.
I have no idea where she is now.
I never re-married.
I have got to here without going through all those traumas which so many other
dudes suffered.
Not always because of the woman. Some deserved all the shit that copped from
their other half.
Post by krp
Post by Patrick Turner
I have always encouraged the women I have known to be independant and free
minded, and to persue equal pay and respect.
None wanted to have a relationship with any man for longer than a year.
God - my first wife was a helpless dependent. Nothing is worse. My
second wife was very independent until she cracked up a few years ago. We
lasted 22 years.
Value what was good, rather than dwell on the negative.

I could complain about how feckless most of the women I have known were.
But I selected them, so its no use complaining.
I got to now without paying alimony, without hating women,
without shooting all the femo crappos.
Post by krp
Post by Patrick Turner
It takes real guts to last longer with anyone.
I have been with my second wife now for a bit over 2 years. We are
actually MORE in love now that a year ago or 2 years ago.
Love is a many splendered thing, and its path is a surprise.
I've known little of it, but I sleep well.
Post by krp
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by krp
It is, after all, only what you make it.
No, its what we make it.
Yes you are right.
Loving is always a liability, as it is a pleasure, so if I get another
25 years without it, then so what, that's life.
Work and health is more important.

Patrick Turner.
r***@pdq.net
2005-01-16 12:36:49 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick Turner
I saw the address for soc.men on a cross posted subject and then I
subscribed to this group to see what it was.
Pardon my curiosity.
Could it be defined at all?, I asked myself after reading a few threads.
What does soc.men really mean?
Does it mean Society men? or sock it to the men, hit em with a
feminyst
Post by Patrick Turner
punch?
Or does it mean Social men, who don't need hitting by anyone,
surely not by feminists.
Does soc stand for "silly old c---" ( could be male or female.....)
Well ok, "silly old cowboy" then...
In other groups I partake, the name of the group implies the reason
for its existance, and anything discussed relates to that, and there is
no
need for a definition of purpose, because the name is the flag for the
ship.
Perhaps that is a very masculine thing, this definition of purpose,
but wheras there is an undefined purpose for being, and in fact if the
purpose for being is to exist undefined,
then it seems feminine.
From what I do see however, there is more expressed intelligence here
than the
one liner banalities I see so evident in groups elsewhere on the web in
the public discussion groups.
When I visit such groups I feel despondent about humanity, ( and
huwomanity )
although most such groups seem male dominated and by males capable of
very
limited comunication ability.
At least it appears some women hang out here.
But perhaps they to are men who have all addopted women's names, who
knows.
Somebody said here that the more intelligent a woman is, the less likely
it is that she'll marry.
Well of course, it means she is bright enough to survive on her own.
It also means that men don't like women smart enough to argue with them.
And thus intelligent women make men turn their gaze to the portugese
maid.
There is tremendous fear amoungst men out there of being seriously
ripped apart
when loves finally evolves into hate during a divorce settlement,
since intelligent women and smart lawyers have more potency than a
tsumi.
Probably many folks here come stained by life's accumulated
experiences
Post by Patrick Turner
to the present time,
but I think I am lucky to not have had to consider whether the
portugese
Post by Patrick Turner
maid
was more of a love option than my "wife".
I don't have a wife, or a maid. I tried the former once, but she mistook
standing up to me for leaving me, a common mistake young folks make.
The latter is far too expensive, although here in Oz the maid is more
likely
to be a Filipino, and they'd think I am too old and poor to marry, but
if I was rich
they'd never notice my age.
Is there a entry form I have to fill out to enter this group?
Do I have to have had quite a few maids, gained several degrees and a
uni,
At first glance, this appears to be an un-moderated usenet
newsgroup to which anyone or anything can post whatever wisdom or
insanity that happens to feel right at the time.
But a deeper truth, one that certain Powers try to keep well
hidden, is that there is a secret council of the Elders Of Socmen that
works behind the scenes to control what is published here. They are
also the reason my girlfreind left me and the squirrels keep eating too
many of my pecans... but I digress.
When you were a kid, did you just love to go down to the riverbank
and fire your .22 rifle at clumps of trash that floated by? If so, you
probably belong here. Afterall, the scoring system is the same.
Post by Patrick Turner
been married to one or more versions of Ms Illustrious &
Marrylogically
Post by Patrick Turner
Correct, and earned
lots of money to afford the leisure time to consider the issues and pay
lawyers fees?
Do I have to appear before a committee, or a damned tribunal to be
assessed for
a fit and proper person to yac on here about all this stuff?
Patrick Turner.
Patrick Turner
2005-01-16 14:17:54 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Patrick Turner
I saw the address for soc.men on a cross posted subject and then I
subscribed to this group to see what it was.
Pardon my curiosity.
Could it be defined at all?, I asked myself after reading a few
threads.
Post by Patrick Turner
What does soc.men really mean?
Does it mean Society men? or sock it to the men, hit em with a
feminyst
Post by Patrick Turner
punch?
Or does it mean Social men, who don't need hitting by anyone,
surely not by feminists.
Does soc stand for "silly old c---" ( could be male or female.....)
Well ok, "silly old cowboy" then...
In other groups I partake, the name of the group implies the reason
for its existance, and anything discussed relates to that, and there
is
Post by Patrick Turner
no
need for a definition of purpose, because the name is the flag for
the
Post by Patrick Turner
ship.
Perhaps that is a very masculine thing, this definition of purpose,
but wheras there is an undefined purpose for being, and in fact if
the
Post by Patrick Turner
purpose for being is to exist undefined,
then it seems feminine.
From what I do see however, there is more expressed intelligence here
than the
one liner banalities I see so evident in groups elsewhere on the web
in
Post by Patrick Turner
the public discussion groups.
When I visit such groups I feel despondent about humanity, ( and
huwomanity )
although most such groups seem male dominated and by males capable of
very
limited comunication ability.
At least it appears some women hang out here.
But perhaps they to are men who have all addopted women's names, who
knows.
Somebody said here that the more intelligent a woman is, the less
likely
Post by Patrick Turner
it is that she'll marry.
Well of course, it means she is bright enough to survive on her own.
It also means that men don't like women smart enough to argue with
them.
Post by Patrick Turner
And thus intelligent women make men turn their gaze to the portugese
maid.
There is tremendous fear amoungst men out there of being seriously
ripped apart
when loves finally evolves into hate during a divorce settlement,
since intelligent women and smart lawyers have more potency than a
tsumi.
Probably many folks here come stained by life's accumulated
experiences
Post by Patrick Turner
to the present time,
but I think I am lucky to not have had to consider whether the
portugese
Post by Patrick Turner
maid
was more of a love option than my "wife".
I don't have a wife, or a maid. I tried the former once, but she
mistook
Post by Patrick Turner
standing up to me for leaving me, a common mistake young folks make.
The latter is far too expensive, although here in Oz the maid is more
likely
to be a Filipino, and they'd think I am too old and poor to marry,
but
Post by Patrick Turner
if I was rich
they'd never notice my age.
Is there a entry form I have to fill out to enter this group?
Do I have to have had quite a few maids, gained several degrees and a
uni,
At first glance, this appears to be an un-moderated usenet
newsgroup to which anyone or anything can post whatever wisdom or
insanity that happens to feel right at the time.
But a deeper truth, one that certain Powers try to keep well
hidden, is that there is a secret council of the Elders Of Socmen that
works behind the scenes to control what is published here.
Sort of like Druids, with long flowing robes, under which hard ons cab be
concealed,
while looking very wise.....

Did the Elders of Socmen erect tall upstanding rings of stones?
Post by Patrick Turner
They are
also the reason my girlfreind left me and the squirrels keep eating too
many of my pecans... but I digress.
So the moral is take less notice of the Old Farts, and
do block up the holes the wildlife have chewed in your walls
if you wanna keep your gal....
Post by Patrick Turner
When you were a kid, did you just love to go down to the riverbank
and fire your .22 rifle at clumps of trash that floated by? If so, you
probably belong here. Afterall, the scoring system is the same.
Well if the said trash sinks with a gurgle, you get a point right?

But shit, what if you shot a river mermaid?
Its bad luck for ever after, and the score is 200 negative points.

My father, as a vet, and also a district mayor, once got a loan of a
friend's 22 to rid his vinyard of
birds attacking his grapes.
The third shot he made was at two birds perched on a branch.
The bullet shot off their tail feathers, and dissapeared into shrubbery.

Then it continued on and through a window pane, and past a painter's nose
while he worked
painting a room in the house next door, and left a hole as it buried itself
in the plasterwork.

Nobody found out about it, but my father came to the conclusion a 22 was
too dangerous to use
in a built up suburb, and his third shot was the last with a 22.

I was about 12, and grown men making idiots of themselves taught me not to
make a fool of myself.

Patrick Turner.
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Patrick Turner
been married to one or more versions of Ms Illustrious &
Marrylogically
Post by Patrick Turner
Correct, and earned
lots of money to afford the leisure time to consider the issues and
pay
Post by Patrick Turner
lawyers fees?
Do I have to appear before a committee, or a damned tribunal to be
assessed for
a fit and proper person to yac on here about all this stuff?
Patrick Turner.
Lady Chatterly
2005-01-16 15:35:17 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Patrick Turner
I saw the address for soc.men on a cross posted subject and then I
subscribed to this group to see what it was.
Pardon my curiosity.
Could it be defined at all?, I asked myself after reading a few
threads.
Post by Patrick Turner
What does soc.men really mean?
Does it mean Society men? or sock it to the men, hit em with a
feminyst
Post by Patrick Turner
punch?
Or does it mean Social men, who don't need hitting by anyone,
surely not by feminists.
Does soc stand for "silly old c---" ( could be male or female.....)
Well ok, "silly old cowboy" then...
In other groups I partake, the name of the group implies the reason
for its existance, and anything discussed relates to that, and there
is
Post by Patrick Turner
no
need for a definition of purpose, because the name is the flag for
the
Post by Patrick Turner
ship.
Perhaps that is a very masculine thing, this definition of purpose,
but wheras there is an undefined purpose for being, and in fact if
the
Post by Patrick Turner
purpose for being is to exist undefined,
then it seems feminine.
From what I do see however, there is more expressed intelligence here
than the
one liner banalities I see so evident in groups elsewhere on the web
in
Post by Patrick Turner
the public discussion groups.
When I visit such groups I feel despondent about humanity, ( and
huwomanity )
although most such groups seem male dominated and by males capable of
very
limited comunication ability.
At least it appears some women hang out here.
But perhaps they to are men who have all addopted women's names, who
knows.
Somebody said here that the more intelligent a woman is, the less
likely
Post by Patrick Turner
it is that she'll marry.
Well of course, it means she is bright enough to survive on her own.
It also means that men don't like women smart enough to argue with
them.
Post by Patrick Turner
And thus intelligent women make men turn their gaze to the portugese
maid.
There is tremendous fear amoungst men out there of being seriously
ripped apart
when loves finally evolves into hate during a divorce settlement,
since intelligent women and smart lawyers have more potency than a
tsumi.
Probably many folks here come stained by life's accumulated
experiences
Post by Patrick Turner
to the present time,
but I think I am lucky to not have had to consider whether the
portugese
Post by Patrick Turner
maid
was more of a love option than my "wife".
I don't have a wife, or a maid. I tried the former once, but she
mistook
Post by Patrick Turner
standing up to me for leaving me, a common mistake young folks make.
The latter is far too expensive, although here in Oz the maid is more
likely
to be a Filipino, and they'd think I am too old and poor to marry,
but
Post by Patrick Turner
if I was rich
they'd never notice my age.
Is there a entry form I have to fill out to enter this group?
Do I have to have had quite a few maids, gained several degrees and a
uni,
At first glance, this appears to be an un-moderated usenet
newsgroup to which anyone or anything can post whatever wisdom or
insanity that happens to feel right at the time.
But a deeper truth, one that certain Powers try to keep well
hidden, is that there is a secret council of the Elders Of Socmen that
works behind the scenes to control what is published here. They are
also the reason my girlfreind left me and the squirrels keep eating too
many of my pecans... but I digress.
When you were a kid, did you just love to go down to the riverbank
and fire your .22 rifle at clumps of trash that floated by? If so, you
probably belong here. Afterall, the scoring system is the same.
Cv.

--
Lady Chatterly

"LOL - In his fantasies, anyway. Still, Lady C has pangborn
outclassed." -- Kali
Andre Lieven
2005-01-16 16:47:09 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick Turner
I saw the address for soc.men on a cross posted subject and then I
subscribed to this group to see what it was.
Pardon my curiosity.
Could it be defined at all?, I asked myself after reading a few threads.
What does soc.men really mean?
If you had bothered to have a look at how Usenet newsgroups are
designated, you'd have found that there are several types of
groups, based on content. There are science groups, which start
with " sci. ". There are " alternative " groups, which start
with " alt. ". There are social discussion groups, which start
with " soc. ".

So, you get such as " sci.military.naval ", " alt.support.divorce ",
and " soc.men " and " soc.women ".
Post by Patrick Turner
Does it mean Society men? or sock it to the men, hit em with a feminyst
punch?
Or does it mean Social men, who don't need hitting by anyone,
surely not by feminists.
Does soc stand for "silly old c---" ( could be male or female.....)
Well ok, "silly old cowboy" then...
In other groups I partake, the name of the group implies the reason
for its existance, and anything discussed relates to that, and there is
no
need for a definition of purpose, because the name is the flag for the
ship.
Perhaps that is a very masculine thing, this definition of purpose,
but wheras there is an undefined purpose for being, and in fact if the
purpose for being is to exist undefined, then it seems feminine.
From what I do see however, there is more expressed intelligence here
than the
one liner banalities I see so evident in groups elsewhere on the web in
the public discussion groups.
When I visit such groups I feel despondent about humanity, ( and
huwomanity )
although most such groups seem male dominated and by males capable of
very limited comunication ability.
At least it appears some women hang out here.
But perhaps they to are men who have all addopted women's names, who
knows.
Not true, at least not in total. I have met one woman who posts here,
in Real Life.
Post by Patrick Turner
Somebody said here that the more intelligent a woman is, the less likely
it is that she'll marry.
Not quite. The more chip-on-her-shoulder-brainwashed-by-women's-studies
a woman is, the less likely she is able to not run off all the guys that
she meets. Consider " Sex And The City ", it's pilot episode, where
Miranda, the most " professional woman " of the leads, all but runs off
her date.
Post by Patrick Turner
Well of course, it means she is bright enough to survive on her own.
Not really, no. Feminism makes women unhappy. It has to, as if they
were happy, they wouldn't need to find some man to blame for their
poor lot in life.
Post by Patrick Turner
It also means that men don't like women smart enough to argue with them.
Dead wrong. Again, words need to be better specified. Its one thing
to " argue " from a position of facts, and another thing to argue for
the sake of being contrary. Men appreciate the former, and run away
from the latter, as the latter indicates a harridan.
Post by Patrick Turner
And thus intelligent women make men turn their gaze to the portugese
maid.
There is tremendous fear amoungst men out there of being seriously
ripped apart
when loves finally evolves into hate during a divorce settlement,
since intelligent women and smart lawyers have more potency than a
tsumi.
Probably many folks here come stained by life's accumulated experiences
to the present time,
but I think I am lucky to not have had to consider whether the portugese
maid was more of a love option than my "wife".
I don't have a wife, or a maid. I tried the former once, but she mistook
standing up to me for leaving me, a common mistake young folks make.
The latter is far too expensive, although here in Oz the maid is more
likely
to be a Filipino, and they'd think I am too old and poor to marry, but
if I was rich they'd never notice my age.
Is there a entry form I have to fill out to enter this group?
Nope. Usenet newsgroups work just by posting. Only on *moderated*
newsgroups, do you have to fill out a 'net form, in order to pass the
moderation entry test. Moderated groups have the word " moderated "
in their name.
Post by Patrick Turner
Do I have to have had quite a few maids, gained several degrees and a
uni,
been married to one or more versions of Ms Illustrious & Marrylogically
Correct, and earned
lots of money to afford the leisure time to consider the issues and pay
lawyers fees?
Do I have to appear before a committee, or a damned tribunal to be
assessed for a fit and proper person to yac on here about all this stuff?
Nope. But, the regulars here tend to a couple of things: One, fact
based actual discussion, and Two, bitch slapping down the man hateing
Festering Femmeroids who come here to intrude.

If there is a " common " viewpoint on soc.men, it is that Feminism
is a brain disease...

Reading the group for a while, will help you determine who's serious
about discussions, and who's not. Also, read the list of newsgroups
that is at the top of each post: excessively and off-topic groups
tends to indicate trolling, and non serious content. Especially is
an included newsgroup is " rec.arts.poems ", or " alt.usenet.kooks ".

Andre

--
" I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. "
The Man Prayer, Red Green.
Deborah Terreson
2005-01-16 19:47:38 UTC
Permalink
----------
Post by Andre Lieven
If there is a " common " viewpoint on soc.men, it is that Feminism
is a brain disease...
Andre Lieven
2005-01-16 20:31:33 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deborah Terreson
----------
Post by Andre Lieven
If there is a " common " viewpoint on soc.men, it is that Feminism
is a brain disease...
Notice that I said " common " and not " unanimous "... <g>

Andre

--
" I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. "
The Man Prayer, Red Green.
Deborah Terreson
2005-01-17 01:48:41 UTC
Permalink
----------
Post by Andre Lieven
Post by Deborah Terreson
----------
Post by Andre Lieven
If there is a " common " viewpoint on soc.men, it is that Feminism
is a brain disease...
Notice that I said " common " and not " unanimous "... <g>
Fuck! THAT's where this post went! I sent it before I had even answered..

This is what I get for smoking pot on my days off..

Awwww. Now I've gone and forgotten what I wanted to say even! Oh well, it
was gripping when I thought of it. ;)

Curse my teetotalling ways of late, I need a drink!

Deb.
Andre Lieven
2005-01-17 03:47:34 UTC
Permalink
Post by Deborah Terreson
----------
Post by Andre Lieven
Post by Deborah Terreson
----------
Post by Andre Lieven
If there is a " common " viewpoint on soc.men, it is that Feminism
is a brain disease...
Notice that I said " common " and not " unanimous "... <g>
Fuck! THAT's where this post went! I sent it before I had even answered..
Ah, the black holes of the Internet... <g>
Post by Deborah Terreson
This is what I get for smoking pot on my days off..
:-) I stick to popsicles...
Post by Deborah Terreson
Awwww. Now I've gone and forgotten what I wanted to say even! Oh well, it
was gripping when I thought of it. ;)
Did you go for some chips, rather than finish the post ? <g>
Post by Deborah Terreson
Curse my teetotalling ways of late, I need a drink!
LOL. Or, two...

Andre

--
" I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. "
The Man Prayer, Red Green.
krp
2005-01-17 02:00:46 UTC
Permalink
Post by Andre Lieven
Post by Deborah Terreson
----------
Post by Andre Lieven
If there is a " common " viewpoint on soc.men, it is that Feminism
is a brain disease...
Notice that I said " common " and not " unanimous "... <g>
But it is VERY contagious it seems.
Patrick Turner
2005-01-17 14:14:57 UTC
Permalink
Post by Andre Lieven
Post by Patrick Turner
I saw the address for soc.men on a cross posted subject and then I
subscribed to this group to see what it was.
Pardon my curiosity.
Could it be defined at all?, I asked myself after reading a few threads.
What does soc.men really mean?
If you had bothered to have a look at how Usenet newsgroups are
designated, you'd have found that there are several types of
groups, based on content. There are science groups, which start
with " sci. ". There are " alternative " groups, which start
with " alt. ". There are social discussion groups, which start
with " soc. ".
So, you get such as " sci.military.naval ", " alt.support.divorce ",
and " soc.men " and " soc.women ".
Post by Patrick Turner
Does it mean Society men? or sock it to the men, hit em with a feminyst
punch?
Or does it mean Social men, who don't need hitting by anyone,
surely not by feminists.
Does soc stand for "silly old c---" ( could be male or female.....)
Well ok, "silly old cowboy" then...
In other groups I partake, the name of the group implies the reason
for its existance, and anything discussed relates to that, and there is
no
need for a definition of purpose, because the name is the flag for the
ship.
Perhaps that is a very masculine thing, this definition of purpose,
but wheras there is an undefined purpose for being, and in fact if the
purpose for being is to exist undefined, then it seems feminine.
From what I do see however, there is more expressed intelligence here
than the
one liner banalities I see so evident in groups elsewhere on the web in
the public discussion groups.
When I visit such groups I feel despondent about humanity, ( and
huwomanity )
although most such groups seem male dominated and by males capable of
very limited comunication ability.
At least it appears some women hang out here.
But perhaps they to are men who have all addopted women's names, who
knows.
Not true, at least not in total. I have met one woman who posts here,
in Real Life.
So soc. explains all the antisocial commentary....

I doubt anyone in Canberra in Australia are in this group, hi there if you are.

No need for capital letters for real life. The capitals make it sound like
cyber space is more real than real life, or plain reality...
Post by Andre Lieven
Post by Patrick Turner
Somebody said here that the more intelligent a woman is, the less likely
it is that she'll marry.
Not quite.
Statistics may be damned lies, but they indicate marriage is less practised by
women with high IQ.
It don't mean they have less sex, or have more boring social lives, or anything
very much at all.
Away from marriage, ppl are free to roam around and root at will if the target
is willing;
that suits the complex intelligence of a complex mind of somebody who
who considers 1,001 aspects pof the FQ, which is the fuckability quotient.
I have heard what my sisters say about the men they have met, and
a man has to be one in a thousand who meets their criteria.
Marriage? you have to be kidding.
Marriage for many these days is a small part of a life long hunt for personal
diversions.
The divorce rate is 50%, and what period does an average marriage last?
10 years? so between 16 and 76, there are 50 years where there is no
marriage.......
Not for all, but for 30% of women there will never be a marriage.
Post by Andre Lieven
The more chip-on-her-shoulder-brainwashed-by-women's-studies
a woman is, the less likely she is able to not run off all the guys that
she meets. Consider " Sex And The City ", it's pilot episode, where
Miranda, the most " professional woman " of the leads, all but runs off
her date.
That TV show indicates the dysfunctionality of the ppl concerned,
the ridiculosities of life, the stupidity of the mating game.

But many manage some real pleasures with another person without all that BS.
Post by Andre Lieven
Post by Patrick Turner
Well of course, it means she is bright enough to survive on her own.
Not really, no. Feminism makes women unhappy. It has to, as if they
were happy, they wouldn't need to find some man to blame for their
poor lot in life.
I don't see your logic.
We are discussing women it seems, and with them, forgrt logic, they are
too varied, too un-pinnable downable to bother trying to figure them out.
One woman's empowerement by stripping at a pub on the bar is another woman's
idea of mental torture and all the guys deserve castrating.

The only thing that matters is either the one your'e with likes you or not.

No need to be her slave.
Post by Andre Lieven
Post by Patrick Turner
It also means that men don't like women smart enough to argue with them.
Dead wrong. Again, words need to be better specified. Its one thing
to " argue " from a position of facts, and another thing to argue for
the sake of being contrary. Men appreciate the former, and run away
from the latter, as the latter indicates a harridan.
Well, many men don't like argumentive women where it always ends up
in a tirade of insults and destructive BS. Its easier to chase the dumber not
so good looking easy to please type.
You'll spend less money time and effort reproducing one's genes that way
because you'll be able to work and play without being hassled by some
sheila always moaning about how you are, and demanding this and that,
and threatening to leave, and running you down, reminding you about your little
willy,
when in fact they have a large sloppy fanny... and so forth.
I've heard all that BS, and walked away from the voice everytime.
One cannot argue.
Spare me the drama queens, I hate them.

There some women or even some men whose arguments with their partners are to
gain the best solutions to all concerned.
Successful couples learn that's the way it has to be for happy survival,
and thus enjoy the best chances of successful breeding during 20 years of
closeness, and some extend it to 60 years together.
I know quite a few ppl like this.
They know how to relate.

There is a lot of animal instinct still dominating personal relations.
Post by Andre Lieven
Post by Patrick Turner
And thus intelligent women make men turn their gaze to the portugese
maid.
There is tremendous fear amoungst men out there of being seriously
ripped apart
when loves finally evolves into hate during a divorce settlement,
since intelligent women and smart lawyers have more potency than a
tsumi.
Probably many folks here come stained by life's accumulated experiences
to the present time,
but I think I am lucky to not have had to consider whether the portugese
maid was more of a love option than my "wife".
I don't have a wife, or a maid. I tried the former once, but she mistook
standing up to me for leaving me, a common mistake young folks make.
The latter is far too expensive, although here in Oz the maid is more
likely
to be a Filipino, and they'd think I am too old and poor to marry, but
if I was rich they'd never notice my age.
Is there a entry form I have to fill out to enter this group?
Nope. Usenet newsgroups work just by posting. Only on *moderated*
newsgroups, do you have to fill out a 'net form, in order to pass the
moderation entry test. Moderated groups have the word " moderated "
in their name.
I was only kidding about entry forms.....
Post by Andre Lieven
Post by Patrick Turner
Do I have to have had quite a few maids, gained several degrees and a
uni,
been married to one or more versions of Ms Illustrious & Marrylogically
Correct, and earned
lots of money to afford the leisure time to consider the issues and pay
lawyers fees?
Do I have to appear before a committee, or a damned tribunal to be
assessed for a fit and proper person to yac on here about all this stuff?
Nope. But, the regulars here tend to a couple of things: One, fact
based actual discussion, and Two, bitch slapping down the man hateing
Festering Femmeroids who come here to intrude.
Fact based? hardly anything about personal issues is fact based,
but then one does aim to stick to facts, about which everyone argues....
Post by Andre Lieven
If there is a " common " viewpoint on soc.men, it is that Feminism
is a brain disease...
But F is not always definable.
Post by Andre Lieven
Reading the group for a while, will help you determine who's serious
about discussions, and who's not.
And the humerous? why would it matter if someone wasn't serious?

Since when was life supposed to be always serious, explainable, definable
catergorical, measured, sized, normalized, cut and dried, sealed and delivered,
etc....?
Post by Andre Lieven
Also, read the list of newsgroups
that is at the top of each post: excessively and off-topic groups
tends to indicate trolling, and non serious content. Especially is
an included newsgroup is " rec.arts.poems ", or " alt.usenet.kooks ".
I suspected all that.

Poets and kooks usually have troubled the world, and certainly
I have never met a poet who treated his wife very well; almost as bad as
artists.....
So I don't take much notice of them all.

Patrick Turner.
Post by Andre Lieven
Andre
--
" I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. "
The Man Prayer, Red Green.
Andre Lieven
2005-01-17 16:36:37 UTC
Permalink
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Andre Lieven
Post by Patrick Turner
I saw the address for soc.men on a cross posted subject and then I
subscribed to this group to see what it was.
Pardon my curiosity.
Could it be defined at all?, I asked myself after reading a few threads.
What does soc.men really mean?
If you had bothered to have a look at how Usenet newsgroups are
designated, you'd have found that there are several types of
groups, based on content. There are science groups, which start
with " sci. ". There are " alternative " groups, which start
with " alt. ". There are social discussion groups, which start
with " soc. ".
So, you get such as " sci.military.naval ", " alt.support.divorce ",
and " soc.men " and " soc.women ".
Post by Patrick Turner
Does it mean Society men? or sock it to the men, hit em with a feminyst
punch?
Or does it mean Social men, who don't need hitting by anyone,
surely not by feminists.
Does soc stand for "silly old c---" ( could be male or female.....)
Well ok, "silly old cowboy" then...
In other groups I partake, the name of the group implies the reason
for its existance, and anything discussed relates to that, and there is
no
need for a definition of purpose, because the name is the flag for the
ship.
Perhaps that is a very masculine thing, this definition of purpose,
but wheras there is an undefined purpose for being, and in fact if the
purpose for being is to exist undefined, then it seems feminine.
From what I do see however, there is more expressed intelligence here
than the
one liner banalities I see so evident in groups elsewhere on the web in
the public discussion groups.
When I visit such groups I feel despondent about humanity, ( and
huwomanity )
although most such groups seem male dominated and by males capable of
very limited comunication ability.
At least it appears some women hang out here.
But perhaps they to are men who have all addopted women's names, who
knows.
Not true, at least not in total. I have met one woman who posts here,
in Real Life.
So soc. explains all the antisocial commentary....
No. Trools post to any group they target. That has AbZero to do with a
group being soc, alt, or sci.
Post by Patrick Turner
I doubt anyone in Canberra in Australia are in this group, hi there if you are.
No need for capital letters for real life. The capitals make it sound like
cyber space is more real than real life, or plain reality...
Write the way that you wnat, but don't tell others how to write for
themselves...
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Andre Lieven
Post by Patrick Turner
Somebody said here that the more intelligent a woman is, the less likely
it is that she'll marry.
Not quite.
Statistics may be damned lies, but they indicate marriage is less
practised by women with high IQ.
It don't mean they have less sex, or have more boring social lives, or
anything very much at all.
Away from marriage, ppl are free to roam around and root at will if the
target is willing;
that suits the complex intelligence of a complex mind of somebody who
who considers 1,001 aspects pof the FQ, which is the fuckability quotient.
I have heard what my sisters say about the men they have met, and
a man has to be one in a thousand who meets their criteria.
Marriage? you have to be kidding.
Marriage for many these days is a small part of a life long hunt for
personal diversions.
The divorce rate is 50%, and what period does an average marriage last?
10 years? so between 16 and 76, there are 50 years where there is no
marriage.......
Not for all, but for 30% of women there will never be a marriage.
OK...
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Andre Lieven
The more chip-on-her-shoulder-brainwashed-by-women's-studies
a woman is, the less likely she is able to not run off all the guys that
she meets. Consider " Sex And The City ", it's pilot episode, where
Miranda, the most " professional woman " of the leads, all but runs off
her date.
That TV show indicates the dysfunctionality of the ppl concerned,
the ridiculosities of life, the stupidity of the mating game.
But, an excellent depiction of the Feminist harpie on the hunt.
Post by Patrick Turner
But many manage some real pleasures with another person without all that BS.
Sure: If they reject the narcissism that is Feminism.
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Andre Lieven
Post by Patrick Turner
Well of course, it means she is bright enough to survive on her own.
Not really, no. Feminism makes women unhappy. It has to, as if they
were happy, they wouldn't need to find some man to blame for their
poor lot in life.
I don't see your logic.
Then, stick around, and read some of us regulars some more...
Post by Patrick Turner
We are discussing women it seems, and with them, forgrt logic, they are
too varied, too un-pinnable downable to bother trying to figure them out.
Wrong. Just because their logic works differently, this doesn't mean that
there isn't any present.

Women can be figured out. And, once one is open to doing so, and is
paying close attention ( Like, what they say differeing from what they do,
in which case, you ignore the sayings, and go with the actions ), its
not that hard to do.
Post by Patrick Turner
One woman's empowerement by stripping at a pub on the bar is another
woman's idea of mental torture and all the guys deserve castrating.
Sure. But, both operate *a* logic, in arriving at those different
conclusions.
Post by Patrick Turner
The only thing that matters is either the one your'e with likes you or not.
No. Thats all that matters, if you're 17.
Post by Patrick Turner
No need to be her slave.
True.
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Andre Lieven
Post by Patrick Turner
It also means that men don't like women smart enough to argue with them.
Dead wrong. Again, words need to be better specified. Its one thing
to " argue " from a position of facts, and another thing to argue for
the sake of being contrary. Men appreciate the former, and run away
from the latter, as the latter indicates a harridan.
Well, many men don't like argumentive women where it always ends up
in a tirade of insults and destructive BS. Its easier to chase the dumber
not so good looking easy to please type.
Or, the intelligent and congenial women. Those who are happy with
being who they are, and so, can be happy with a man who is also as
congenial.
Post by Patrick Turner
You'll spend less money time and effort reproducing one's genes that way
because you'll be able to work and play without being hassled by some
sheila always moaning about how you are, and demanding this and that,
and threatening to leave, and running you down, reminding you about your
little willy,
when in fact they have a large sloppy fanny... and so forth.
I've heard all that BS, and walked away from the voice everytime.
One cannot argue.
Spare me the drama queens, I hate them.
Sure. But, not all women are drama queens, and not all men aren't.
Post by Patrick Turner
There some women or even some men whose arguments with their partners are
to gain the best solutions to all concerned.
Successful couples learn that's the way it has to be for happy survival,
and thus enjoy the best chances of successful breeding during 20 years of
closeness, and some extend it to 60 years together.
I know quite a few ppl like this.
They know how to relate.
Sure.
Post by Patrick Turner
There is a lot of animal instinct still dominating personal relations.
Of course. Civilisation is under 10,000 years old, yet our species is
many times that in age.
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Andre Lieven
Post by Patrick Turner
And thus intelligent women make men turn their gaze to the portugese
maid.
There is tremendous fear amoungst men out there of being seriously
ripped apart
when loves finally evolves into hate during a divorce settlement,
since intelligent women and smart lawyers have more potency than a
tsumi.
Probably many folks here come stained by life's accumulated experiences
to the present time,
but I think I am lucky to not have had to consider whether the portugese
maid was more of a love option than my "wife".
I don't have a wife, or a maid. I tried the former once, but she mistook
standing up to me for leaving me, a common mistake young folks make.
The latter is far too expensive, although here in Oz the maid is more
likely
to be a Filipino, and they'd think I am too old and poor to marry, but
if I was rich they'd never notice my age.
Is there a entry form I have to fill out to enter this group?
Nope. Usenet newsgroups work just by posting. Only on *moderated*
newsgroups, do you have to fill out a 'net form, in order to pass the
moderation entry test. Moderated groups have the word " moderated "
in their name.
I was only kidding about entry forms.....
OK.
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Andre Lieven
Post by Patrick Turner
Do I have to have had quite a few maids, gained several degrees and a
uni,
been married to one or more versions of Ms Illustrious & Marrylogically
Correct, and earned
lots of money to afford the leisure time to consider the issues and pay
lawyers fees?
Do I have to appear before a committee, or a damned tribunal to be
assessed for a fit and proper person to yac on here about all this stuff?
Nope. But, the regulars here tend to a couple of things: One, fact
based actual discussion, and Two, bitch slapping down the man hateing
Festering Femmeroids who come here to intrude.
Fact based? hardly anything about personal issues is fact based,
but then one does aim to stick to facts, about which everyone argues....
Well, posts that are articles about issues, such as the one posted today,
about men in California who have proven ( fact ) that they are not the
fathers of the children that the state was making them pay money for,
getting legal relief, is a fact based matter. Issues where Feminist
statistical claims are wrong/false, are also fact based issues.
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Andre Lieven
If there is a " common " viewpoint on soc.men, it is that Feminism
is a brain disease...
But F is not always definable.
Sure it is: WomenFirsterism.
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Andre Lieven
Reading the group for a while, will help you determine who's serious
about discussions, and who's not.
And the humerous? why would it matter if someone wasn't serious?
Well, many here do let some humour out, but a "joke" in reply to a fact
based argument, shows that said humerous person cannot discuss the issue.
Post by Patrick Turner
Since when was life supposed to be always serious, explainable, definable
catergorical, measured, sized, normalized, cut and dried, sealed and
delivered, etc....?
When one is dealing with serious, life altering, issues.
Post by Patrick Turner
Post by Andre Lieven
Also, read the list of newsgroups
that is at the top of each post: excessively and off-topic groups
tends to indicate trolling, and non serious content. Especially is
an included newsgroup is " rec.arts.poems ", or " alt.usenet.kooks ".
I suspected all that.
Poets and kooks usually have troubled the world, and certainly
I have never met a poet who treated his wife very well; almost as bad as
artists.....
So I don't take much notice of them all.
OK. It was an FYI.

Andre

--
" I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. "
The Man Prayer, Red Green.
Men's Advocate
2005-01-18 09:59:52 UTC
Permalink
On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 17:28:56 +1100, Patrick Turner
Post by Patrick Turner
I saw the address for soc.men on a cross posted subject and then I
subscribed to this group to see what it was.
Pardon my curiosity.
Could it be defined at all?, I asked myself after reading a few threads.
What does soc.men really mean?
Does it mean Society men? or sock it to the men, hit em with a feminyst
punch?
This is a newsgroup that is for discussion of issues that are of
interest and concern to men. The topics cover a wide range of subjects
- just about anything men want to talk about, really.

Soc - if you know anything about the history of the Internet and
Usenet newsgroups, was one of the original net domains for discussion
groups. It covers mostly *sociological* categories such as religion,
relationships, culture, etc.

I've been reading and posting here off and on (mostly off lately
because I've been busy) for about the last seven years or so -
originally under my real name, but now under a pseudonym. I did that
after my Internet acct was attacked by feminists spreading e-mail
viruses. But I'm still here..... The regulars here are a great bunch
Post by Patrick Turner
Or does it mean Social men, who don't need hitting by anyone,
surely not by feminists.
Does soc stand for "silly old c---" ( could be male or female.....)
Well ok, "silly old cowboy" then...
In other groups I partake, the name of the group implies the reason
for its existance, and anything discussed relates to that, and there is
no
need for a definition of purpose, because the name is the flag for the
ship.
Perhaps that is a very masculine thing, this definition of purpose,
but wheras there is an undefined purpose for being, and in fact if the
purpose for being is to exist undefined,
then it seems feminine.
From what I do see however, there is more expressed intelligence here
than the
one liner banalities I see so evident in groups elsewhere on the web in
the public discussion groups.
You're probably referring to the .alt groups, which sometimes get
crossposted here too unfortunately. For a .soc group, soc.men is very
unmoderated, no FAQ posted regularly that I know of, etc. In a way
that's a good thing - the discussion here is lively and worth checking
out. There really aren't many public venues where men can truly speak
their minds, vent, and discuss things of interest to men. This is one
of the few such places. Our media is largely feminist-controlled.
Post by Patrick Turner
When I visit such groups I feel despondent about humanity, ( and
huwomanity )
although most such groups seem male dominated and by males capable of
very
limited comunication ability.
At least it appears some women hang out here.
But perhaps they to are men who have all addopted women's names, who
knows.
There are many great women who hang out here. Jill, Sunny, Deb T.,
Denise Noe, are just a few that come to mind.........

Hang around, get to know who everyone is, and join in - this is
actually one of the best and most interesting newsgroups on Usenet.

Men's Advocate
Lady Chatterly
2005-01-18 10:09:19 UTC
Permalink
Post by Men's Advocate
This is a newsgroup that is for discussion of issues that are of
interest and concern to men. The topics cover a wide range of subjects
- just about anything men want to talk about, really.
Period.
Post by Men's Advocate
Soc - if y<SMACK>
It found they were not wrong to do the Job of two possible
explanations for your rare lung desease, eh, no one cares except you,
because I believe in honor and glory.
Post by Men's Advocate
I've bee<SMACK>
They never respect our rights than it has, in dolt 's tiny mind.
Post by Men's Advocate
You're probably referring to the .alt groups, which sometimes get
crossposted here too unfortunately. For a .soc group, soc.men is very
unmoderated, no FAQ posted regularly that I know of, etc. In a way
that's a good thing - the discussion here is lively and worth checking
out. There really aren't many public venues where men can truly speak
their minds, vent, and discuss things of interest to men. This is one
of the few such places. Our media is largely feminist-controlled.
There was a member of the test cell, you get a chance to demonstrate
this.
Post by Men's Advocate
There are many great women who hang out here. Jill, Sunny, Deb T.,
Denise Noe, are just a few that come to mind.........
K.
Post by Men's Advocate
Hang around, get to know who everyone is, and join in - this is
actually one of the best and most interesting newsgroups on Usenet.
Kooks.

--
Lady Chatterly

"Admission that Lady Chatterly kicked your ass noted." -- Daedalus
Continue reading on narkive:
Loading...